The last thing he said to me was "I don't know where I'll post this meme, but it won't smell too good, that's for sure!" That poster's name was sPamMonkee0609.

IRS Prepares to Cut Workforce by 25%
April 6, 2025

It's been five months and it's still quite amusing (depending on how you look at it) to see the left still defends Kamala Harris.  Well, they've pretty much completely ignored her, but to the extent she's ever mentioned, they continuously insist her campaign was flawless.  They're not going to fix any of their problems if they keep relying on that idiocy.

For starters, if it was so flawless, how did she lose?  Or at the very least, why isn't she being cited as an example that all other Democratic candidates should follow?  That's strange, to be so perfect that nobody wants to follow your example.  Other politicians aren't citing it either, 'that thing Harris did, I want to do that too!'

The reason this stuck out to me now was just the way they completely ignored how long it took for her to even get started on campaigning.  She did make a few appearances but it was almost six weeks before she did a pre-taped CNN interview as a major public event.  That's a lot longer than you'd expect from someone who actually wants to campaign for POTUS.  And we know she did because she'd ran before.  Ok, she'd quit before the first primary, but she'd at least gotten that far once, why not now?

As I said, it was the delay for the first big interview that sticks out.  She may not know this, and her staff may not, and her supporters may not, but there's this brand-new invention called the internet.  Instead of behaving like Kamala Harris, she could have acted like a competent leader and taken charge.  Pull out her laptop and post a 3-5 minute Youtube video about what she'll do when she's elected.  That would set the tone for the media and Democrat supporters right from the start.

Since that video would be the one place for contact, have one of her staff - assuming the veep actually has anybody willing to put up with her on a daily basis - check those and organize them by subject matter.  Anything with more than 20 people asking the same question, it's probably a hot button issue, so send it to her for the next video.  20 people asked this about Ukraine, 20 asked about inflation, 20 asked about unvaccinated transgender taxpayer-funded abortion, and so on.  That would fill up a day or two right there and the whole world could see how Harris thinks on her feet and how she'd react as POTUS.

Can't say she's not ready for this.  Well you can, but just go with it.  Joe Biden could drop dead any minute and then she'd still be in the exact same situation where she's in charge and has to make immediate decisions.  If she's not capable of doing that when it comes to an election, why would she be any better at that for a 3AM phone call?  Not really the sort of job where you need to wait for several weeks to say anything relevant.

That's one advantage to a primary, that the candidates have to compete with each other.  They can be surprised by what their opponents come up with and have to figure out how to respond.  The party sees who is or isn't any good at this.  This is probably the main reason why they all need to stress that Harris' campaign was flawless because otherwise they'd need to point out how far back the flaws go and how deeply they're intrenched in the Party.  Admitting that wouldn't win more voters, so unless they can get back to stealing elections...

Pope Francis Makes Surprise First Public Appearance in St. Peter's Square During Sunday Mass
April 6, 2025

□ [“Over 50 Countries Have Already Contacted White House to Negotiate Trade and Tariffs"]

Might be looking for people to give bribes to, or maybe to just watch other people negotiating.  I'm sure a lot of that is going on, but I do suspect this is about trying to simplify world trade, which was the point.  Most of these nations have big tariffs on the US anyway, but liberals aren't complaining about that.  Another example of things that are only bad when *we* do them.

China charges us a 67% tariff for US goods in their country, can't we reciprocate in the slightest?  Their government owns all the businesses, they are modern leftism's ideal state, and link it with their military.  Given how many spies and bribes they have all around the world, the slaves and allied nations, they clearly have a plan to use this to be the primary world power.  Things like tariffs and DOGE are a way to purge their influence in our country and whatever allies we have in the world.

It even used to be a liberal thing.  A much poorer Nancy Pelosi demanded tariffs against China in 1996.  The Clintons had a similar policy.  One gets the impression that they used this as an excuse to build ties with China to become much richer in the next 30 years.  Other liberals probably also did.  Dianne Feinstein died with half a billion dollars and lots of connections to China, probably not a coincidence.

British Labour Gov't Quietly Killing Promised Grooming/R@pe Gang Inquiry
April 6, 2024

□ [“The Nationwide 'Hands Off' Marches Pretend at 'Peaceful Protests'"]

Apparently there were protests yesterday.  I know I'd heard they were happening but I'd seen so little attention that I completely forgot about them and haven't heard much since then.  Without USAID, fewer of them can afford to be there, unless they already have decent paying jobs during the week.  It looks like they mostly took place in big cities and similar blue locations.

Maybe they were huge.  I had to work yesterday and haven't gone out since getting home last night, so I didn't hear anything about it.  But I don't get the impression many other people cared.  Those who were funded by Soros were thrilled and everyone else went on with their lives.  What was this supposed to accomplish?  Finding a drug connection or a one-night stand maybe, but what else?

It does take more effort so that's worth noting, but this isn't much different from people getting together on an internet page to post how they agree with each other.  They would already have internet connections with any relevant activists, the rest of them are just cattle going wherever they're told.  Which is basically what happened with the BLM movement, the anti-Iraq movement and basically all the movements going back to the 60s.

U.S. Revokes All Visas from South Sudan For Refusing to Accept Repatriation of Citizens
April 6, 2025

David Hogg’s Gun Control Group ‘March for Our Lives’ Lays Off 13 of Its 16 Full-Time Staff
April 1, 2025

□ [“French Citizens Come Out ‘En Masse’ To Support Marine Le Pen After Bogus Conviction"]

Another protest.  I don't know how many people showed up and wouldn't believe what any media says about the number.  I did see a clip of the crowd singing "La Marseillaise," that's nice.  Definitely need more of that.

□ [“UK Women’s Pool Championship is so Woke, There are No Women in the Finals"]

When something important needs to be done, you don't call a sissy girl-with-a-vagina.  You need a big strong woman-with-a-penis.  I do hope that this has more to do with female competitors refusing to take part in this and dropping out.

I get that the actual trans people are too insane to notice this, but don't any of their supporters realize that this movement is excluding actual females.  You can have individual women doing their best to succeed at whatever their interests are, or you can have them compete against imaginary genders, but you can't have both.  They will always lose.

I still think that the trans movement is in its last days, at least for this iteration.  They'll probably try again in a few decades but this has really shown sane people why it's a bad idea.  It's also parallel to the feminism of the last several decades turning women into sluts who have nothing else to offer, which is why men are generally ignoring them now and finding something productive to do instead.  And this comes from destruction of the family unit which is central to building civilization.

It only works with 'one man, one woman, 'til death do us part.'  Every other attempt is just causing its own problems and will eventually fail.  At least this version has moved fairly quickly, probably because of technology.  I'd assume television and movies did more to program women into doing this and those were made by leftist perverts in Hollywood to brainwash the plebes.  Then the internet multiplied the effect.

My theory is still that basically all of history was a prelude to the 1800s which was a prelude to World War I which set the rest of the 20th century.  We're a quarter of the way through the 20-hundreds, I think it's safe to say this conflict is what this century will be about.  Like it or not, that's why we're here, to face it and hope we can last to the next generation and the next century.  We'll have to wait and see.

Race-Obsessed Elie Mystal Says All Laws Before 1965 Should Be ‘Presumptively Unconstitutional’: “Why Should I Give About Some Law That Some Old White Man Passed”
April 6, 2025