I remember when we used to have real post titles, jokes that could make you think and laugh, lines that added something to our lines. Not like this garbage. And it's all your fault for not buying Rococo Coffee!

Washington State Mom Wrecks Her Car on the Interstate and Stabs Her Two Children
October 6, 2026

□ [“Sign of Desperation?  Democrats Send Barack Obama to Michigan to Campaign for Abdul El-Sayed"]

I don't know if it'll make any difference.  Obama was never good at endorsing anybody but himself and his popularity was the sort that required constant attention.  He doesn't do public events so his fans move on.  You can argue that he's not really hurting his reputation by staying out of things for the most part but that means he's just sitting in his mansion and only once-in-a-while coming out to tell us he supports poor people.

So Obama supporters would already be voting for El-Sayed and there's not a whole lot of others who would suddenly get involved because he shows up now.  But maybe they have some options in Michigan the rest of us don't see.  I'm not even talking about voter fraud, if they had that as an option, they don't need Obama.  If Obama is part of the deal - no Obama, no fraud - then why isn't he used more often?  I don't really see how that could work so that just leaves desperation.

The 'Muslim socialist' wing of the party is trying to take a lot of power very quickly.  It doesn't sound like they're doing well although as always, there's no reason to be optimistic.  If so many people agree with them that Orange Man Bad, then they don't need the help.  Or they could at least admit those supporters are incompetent and that's why they need to call Obama in to keep them in line.

Why not send Obama and Michelle on a 50-state tour?  There's less than 50 days left so they'd need to do a couple states in two days but they're devoted to the cause, right?  They're popular, right?  And then celebrate election night at his 'library' in Chicago.  Hell, if none of the Avengers have anything going on, bring them along to help like they did for Harris.  But no, they're focused on this one guy in Michigan because everything is so fine.

Germany’s Former Intel Chief Arrested on Suspicion of Treasonous Espionage
October 6, 2026

□ [“It's Official:  Paramount Closes $81 Billion Warner Bros. Discovery Takeover"]

I've only been watching this as a distant observer, I'm not that interested except on a few minor aspects.  To the extent I care about the merger itself, I'm opposed to it just because I don't think we need such gigantic companies getting even bigger.  But that said, the same capitalism that allows them to exist in the first place also made that possible so you can't have one without the other.  The millionaires complaining about billionaires don't realize this.

Just the fact that so many governments were involved in this merger is a bigger problem.  I can accept that government is the one who keeps records on a business being established and functioning within the law but I think this merger had to go through all 50 states and countless other countries.  That sounds ridiculous as a concept although I guess the company needs to do business in each state and has to comply, and each country, even as it maintains the overall company policy.  Now that I think about it, if these executives and lawyers are capable of pulling that off, they're going to be a lot more effective at doing their jobs than any government officials.  This also mean they can push an *agenda.*

As with everything else, the world is very topsy-turvy here so it's really not clear what's going to be done with these companies.  Notice that all the attention goes to their media properties and none of the other businesses run by these conglomerates.  I'm not complaining, that's all I focus on too, but most of their major properties are going to become public property soon.  A.I. is going to make it possible for anyone to create stories with them.  The digital movement has done everything it can to remove physical copies of the work and the *woke* movement is trying to erase anything that still exists.  Some of us will yearn back to a simpler time when we didn't have such giant companies overseeing our lives and economy, and we could rely on the decency of AOL/Time-Warner.

British Home Secretary:  Nearly All Women Trying to Reach the UK by Boat Are Raped on the Journey
October 6, 2026

□ [“Now Will the Islamic Republic Finally Run Out of Money?"]

The attention to the Iran war has virtually vanished.  I think even the left has realized that nothing is going on which means it's not that big of a deal.  At this point we're just waiting for the mullahs to be removed and it sounds like that's getting very close.  Iran can't even ship oil through the Strait anymore.  Saudi and Yemen are actively fighting the Houthis.  Rumors are growing that Iranians are finally willing to stand up against their oppressors.  The impression is that the regime is desperate to negotiate a peace agreement and Trump's not going for it.

And just a note, gas prices are slowly dropping.  That's always good and we'd like it to be faster but that said, it's obviously happening now and will just keep dropping.  Venezuela and Trump's deals with oil companies in January 2025 are probably the main cause but soon Iran will be included.  The Muslim world is against them and China and Russia have stayed out entirely, at least in public.  Whatever complaints Trump deserves, he does set up things like this.

And he did it without troops on the ground, other than small special forces units.  A lot of people in the regime must be looking for their escape route and the most obvious option would be to help the people revolt.  Or run to the nearest US ship and surrender.  It's irritating how long this has taken but the tide has clearly turned.  We'll see how much effect that has on Muslims in the west and their liberal counterparts.

Rioters Barricade Burning School in Paris, Trapping Students and Staff Inside
October 6, 2026

□ [“Texas Mother Charged with Attempted Capital Murder for Stabbing Husband and Two Babies"]

There's been an increasing number of stories like this in the last several weeks.  I deliberately haven't reported on them because I wanted to see if this was really a trend.  But I've had enough, ok, it's really a thing women are doing because they can.  I doubt they even ask if they'll get away with it or not, they just try to murder their husband and kids.

I think there's been one instance of a man murdering wife and kids, or trying to.  Because I'm not keeping track, I don't remember if he succeeded or killed himself afterwards.  At least one of the women did that.  The only specific cause for this I can identify is leftism, just a spontaneous urge to destroy everything in front of you, regardless of the consequences.  We see this in Muslim suicide bombers too, they have religion and most of them are men so that makes a difference.

Feminism is probably the most obvious thing to blame, the nature of women.  That's probably true but I'll hold back on that to give it a bit more thought.  Because why is this all happening now?  The left is desperate.  They've lost their government funding, Iran isn't helping (along with China and Russia.)  Men are tired of providing everything yet always being the bad guys.  Orange Man Bad and there's an upcoming election happening so do your thing.  And so these women do just that.

There is a collective structure here.  Men don't get it because we see things as simple ranks, who's in charge of this group.  It's different for women but it's not clear how.  There's the one who disagrees, she's the outcast.  It's usually clear who's in charge but not always and it can change.  Those who are rich and famous have been able to push this down to their subordinates, thanks to mass media and the internet.  So then there's the part where rank and feminism do show up, some women just go bonkers and we see that here.

This is what's coming out now.  Men see this and realize that all these decades of 'gender equality' were lies.  Some men will go along, that's how the rank structure works, but most of us will real life day-to-day evidence that this can't function any more and will refuse to take part.  No way to know how many women are actually sensible but those who are will see the best way to go and it's not with the women who are all-of-a-sudden murdering people.

RINO Thom Tillis Runs to The View and Threatens to Dox Trump  “I Got His Number Too”
October 6, 2026

This is not the drug-fueled orgy you're looking for. Move along.

Gunfire Exchanged Between Coast Guard Personnel and Shooters Across US-Mexico Border
October 5, 2026

□ [“Make Brazil Great Again:  Bolsonaro Tops Lula"]

Apparently a lot of South American countries have gotten rid of their leftist leaders in the last year and a half.  It's been noted that USAID funding stopped just before this got started.  Probably not a coincidence, it probably also helped with grabbing Maduro ten months ago.  I notice we haven't heard anything about Venezuela since then.

We also haven't heard much from Cuba.  They're having big problems but it's not clear what they're doing.  My impression was that the Cuban rulers were willing to cave in so long as they could stay in charge.  Cuba has been the center of leftist globalism for decades so there's obviously a lot of connection but we aren't being told what's going on.  More connections to Venezuela, I'm sure.

Then there's Mexico, another major point for this just because of their long border with the US.  Not just the land, there's also the long stretch of water, the Pacific and the Gulf of [insert name].  That's not even considering the history of Mexico and their leaders.  That needs to be handled although I don't know how anything can be done.

Notice that Canada's mostly been ignored under Trump 2.0.  There are the tariffs but there's clearly internal struggle.  Some provinces are trying to become independent and the national leaders are desperate to find someone else to rely on.  They're aiming for the EU, despite providing nothing for Europe.  They're staying quiet but I'm guessing something is building up north as well.  The Monroe Doctrine is not over, the Americas are our turf.

Brooklyn Teacher Under Investigation for Social Media Posts Praising Hamas Architect of October 7 Massacre
October 5, 2026

□ [“AG Todd Blanche Exposes Merrick Garland’s Weaponization to Label School Parents ‘Domestic Terrorists’"]

The Department of Education used the National School Boards Association to push the *woke* agenda, as seen in a memo from July 2021.  Garland was already telling the FBI to go after parents who disagree with the Covid vaccine or Critical Race Theory.  His son-in-law was selling books to schools that said 'whiteness is the devil's work.'  Well that was in a book also promoted in schools at the time, I don't know if that's what his son-in-law got millions of dollars for selling schools.

The trans movement was the most obvious beneficiary for this but it doesn't look like that was the main goal, at least not to Garland and his people.  I just looked at my coverage of July 2021 and they clearly wanted power, that was the real point.  Schools are a very convenient way to do that and the left had already infiltrate the DoE from the top down so the point was to just do more of that.

Unfortunately our response will be 'and nobody's going to jail for this.'  That is true and it is a consistent problem.  But after the events of the last couple weeks, this is where we might see the tide turning.  I don't think it'll be a direct response, 'what are you doing to our kids?  Drugging them, gang-banging them and punishing us?'  But it won't be far off and it will encourage more challenges to the narrative.  Effectively taking the people who went nuts over Lindsay Clancy and Lucy Craig and turning them around to see people like Garland.  Now that would be a show worth watching.

I'm sure there will be more.  I haven't followed the revelations about the Jack Smith investigations of Trump and all the people he was spying on but Garland had appointed him to do that.  I don't think these instances themselves are particularly relevant but they show a connection and that continues to the rest of the *woke* agenda and everything imposed in 2021-2024, along with any leftist precedents.  Top of my head example, notice how the left completely ignored the Epstein files during those years but all of a sudden became obsessed with whatever part of it Trump was involved in.  Now picture *that* being revealed to people who've finally realized their outrage has always gone the wrong direction.

Mob of Youths Savagely Brutalize and Rob Three Female College Students On the Streets of Cincinnati
October 5, 2026

□ [“Will Somali Gang Violence in Minnesota Shape Statewide Races?"]

Just pointing out that for gang violence, fraud and government jobs, Somalis are an overrepresented part of the population.  It's almost like they turning Minnesota into New Somalia.  Oh wait, they are, that's the point.  It's what their tribes always do, it's what Democrats want to maintain power and it's what leftists want to destroy society.  They all see what's going on and only want more of that.

It's been a solid Democrat state for a long time, they've been doing this for years.  We should be looking into who else besides the Somalis get these benefits.  And of course it's going on in as many other states as possible.  Their leaders and administrators are also connected.  Their senator is running for governor and brags that she made it easier for Somalis to send money overseas, this is part of the global laundering.

Partially it's leftism intending to take over the world, i.e. globalism, partially it's Muslims using leftists to do the same thing.  It's also just the nature of society, people who ignore how it's built.  That's what fuels a nation and these people are incapable of realizing that.  It's why a nation collapses or is at least replace by conquerors.  It's not clear if there's a specific intention or if it's just multiple groups that all have the same basic goal.

Illegal Families Given $100k: California Uses ‘Shadow Welfare System’ to Fund Illegals
October 5, 2026

Surprised that nobody's thought of this yet regarding the Lucy Craig event but I just recalled all those pix of Joe Biden feeling up women, often underage women.  It occurred to me that if he can get away with this in public, he can probably get away with more in private at drug-fueled orgies.

If the feminists really want to have a chat about stuff like this, they're going to need to explain why they voted for this guy.  Female secret service agent had to quit because he kept waggling his penis at her, is that what feminists consider acceptable?  They're just going to bring up Trump but his accuser doesn't even know what year it happened.  Biden did it in public, surrounded by people, filmed by the media, over and over and over and over.  At least some events were as Veep when he was swearing in new members of congress and feeling up their wives and daughters and they just had to accept that.

Cornell voted for Biden, this is what they want.  The media was fine with it, they're the ones taking all these pictures.  Democrats loved it, IIRC Gloria Steinem told the New York Times about Bill Clinton something to the effect of 'a man gets one free attempt.'  There was an old story of Ted Kennedy and another member of Congress groping a waitress serving them at a restaurant.  'Sexual liberation' mattered to some people, at least when there were no consequences.

I'm still trying to find collections of the Biden pix, I know someone had put together a dozen or so in one image but I haven't found it yet.  Yet-another problem the left will be facing which they caused.  The Cornell event was in 2024, if you really believe Biden was POTUS, that was on him.

Female Teen Wrestler Alleges Sexual Assault By Male Opponent, Family Takes Title IX Fight to SCOTUS
October 5, 2026

10-4 mild acquaintance

Virginia State University Sued for Suppressing Christian Student Ministries While Exempting Muslim Groups
October 4, 2026

Women rush out to attack anyone they don't like, men hold back. If pressed on the matter, they say 'if they did it, shoot them. If not, ignore it.' And they'll wait for more information.

This event with Lucy Craig and the last couple weeks with Lindsay Clancy are demonstrating the difference between genders very clearly. I don't know why these two have the same initials but it sure looks deliberate, doesn't it? In theory, there are rational women out there, but they're the vast minority. They should be asking who's doing this emotional manipulation of their gender.

Also notice that all of a sudden the trans movement is going silent about this. It's like there's only two genders and everything else is delusion. Men just want to know the facts, good or bad, so they can move on from there. Decent women can accept that. Everybody else, they're the problem here and we're all watching it.

The next scandal will be out in a day or two, more outrage for women. My guess is Trump will be accused of doing something and nobody even knows what year but whatever the accusations are, women will go along with it, at least until they get really sick of doing this. Whoever's in charge is running an emotional train on them.

Possible Plague Crisis in Siberia:  Five Hospitals Under Quarantine, Lab Tech Dies Following Test Tube Accident Containing Plague Bacteria
October 4, 2026

[hours after writing the above]  It's social media so there's no way to know how many commentors are real people, much less those who self-identify as female.  That said, I've noticed a change in opinion.  As the information about Lucy Craig is made public, men are more willing to speak out.  For that matter, there a sizeable percentage of female posters willing to contradict their feminist overlords, both on Craig and Clancy.  Some posts are very clearly A.I. but many are not so I'd like to *feel* that real women have also had enough of this.

The reason I bring this up is because I've been wondering what the reaction will be to the accusation against Trump which will probably come out tomorrow, maybe later this week.  Just the fact that they're doing this seems idiotic but I get the impression they really expect to sweep to victory with three consecutive outrages like this.  I'm not saying they'll fail but if I'm right about most men and even some women turning against this *woke* agenda, this going to be a big thud.  Sensible people will just stare at it and ask 'she can't even remember what year it happened and waited 30 years before bringing it up to people desperate to attack Trump???'

If that happens, a lot of people who went along with the *woke* agenda are going to start asking questions.  Those who already resisted it will see how right they were.  And we haven't even gotten to the mid-terms yet.  The point might be to inspire enough people to totally vote Democrat and Trump can be impeached in January, if not earlier, but they are risking losing a lot of their target audience if they go through with this.

I know there's no evidence but I do tend to go on the assumption that someone in charge is actually sensible.  This might be an instance where they shut it down before anything happens.  I'm remembering (I think it was) October 2024 when Hillary announced some shocking revelation against Trump would be released next week and nothing happened.  They could be running into the same issue here.

There are other possibilities.  Perhaps there is no one in charge sensible enough to put a stop to this before it ruins everything.  Perhaps those in charge work for foreign countries who would be perfectly happen to see a major US party collapse.  Perhaps they will go through with this and they do win the elections big-time.  But even if that happens, I still think the left is closer to collapse than ever before and don't even realize it.  I hope this is what Trump 2.0 has been aiming for the last 19 months.

Chicago Mayor/Obama Henchman Rahm Emanuel Warns Dems Not to Pursue Another Trump Impeachment
October 4, 2026

□ [“Los Angeles Evacuations Underway After Massive Wildfire Breaks Out Amid October Heat Wave"]

A year and a half since the last one and nobody has decided that they should set up a decent fire-fighting system.  Not the city, not the state, they're fine with burning everything down.  Since almost nothing has been rebuilt from the last fire, maybe they just thought it wouldn't be needed again.

As always, I'll just assume the government is doing this deliberately because they can but the citizens might be getting a bit tired of this.  Some of them might not have been taught by the California school system and are capable of asking why they keep voting for a government that promises to protect them but never does.  Hopefully it doesn't damage the high-speed rail construction.

Maybe Newsom and whatsername will decide they need to look good for a change, maybe try to fix things.  I don't know how effective they'll be but it's a possibility.  I also have to wonder how Hollywood will react to this.  They're setting records for insanity so no way to know what they'll do but this just seems like the worst time for this to happen.

British Government Caught Handing Out Thousands of Hijabs to Illegal Boat Migrants
October 4, 2026

□ [“Chris Rock Compares Wokeness to the Salem Witch Trials - the Hunt Had to Invent Offenders"]

I'm never sure about Rock.  He's clearly a leftist although it might be just because that's the only way to have a successful career like his for the last 30+ years.  He even makes sure to mention his support for "marginalized people" so he won't get busted.  But he can also say sensible things as he's doing here, His comment on the Salem trials is historically inaccurate but the point is correct, that they probably did find a few witches but then their job is to keep finding more.  If you only have a thousand toilets in town, you don't need twenty full-time plumbers.

□ [“Baltimore Rock Opera Society Fires New White Director for ‘Cultural Appropriation’"]

This is probably an example of what Rock is talking about.  She was hired in mid-September, she was at the Burning Man festival and her hair was in cornrows.  So now she's fired.  A leftist organization hiring a leftist, that's the first one being purged for not being *woke* enough.  Just the idea of hair-styles being based on skin color is beyond most people's comprehension yet here they are.  She's already talked to a lawyer who points to Maryland laws against discriminating on people based on hair style.  But maybe those laws only apply to blacks.

It's what Rock was talking about, the *woke* rock opera society needs to find a new problem to solve and their now-former employee sees a case of discrimination.  Their own beliefs are just causing conflict for everybody involved and the legal system gets more fuel to feed their fires.  This organization says they're a "volunteer-hire" so that has to affect their employment records.  They obviously weren't working for free so it might be worth looking into who was paying for this but this is an example of a real problem to solve.

U.S. Rushes a Dozen B-1 Bombers Out of Britain Following Suspected Iran-Backed Terror Plot
October 4, 2026

□ [“Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) Says His Solution to Cost of Living Crisis is Raising Taxes"]
□ [“CNN’s Fareed Zakaria Admits Homeless Problems Are Worst in Democrat-Run Cities"]

I don't remotely follow enough media to keep track of this but it at least appears to me like the mass media is realizing that it has to do at least slightly better at reporting on leftists.  Kelly is on CBS and these are both companies owned by Warner Bros. so they have the government looking at them anyway but they're both demonstrating that their solution is to save people money by charging them more money.

Zakaria even admits that blue cities are much more expensive to live in and forbid constructing homes, both of which make it tough to end homelessness.  Kelly claims he'll just raise taxes on people who have more than a million dollars but never points how that works.  He himself has many millions of dollars so you'd think that would make it easy to explain but he doesn't bother.  He'd probably be charging more taxes on people who build homes so there's less incentive to do that.

Maybe it's just my mood but something about this seems very old and tired.  You can understand why the *woke* movement targets these old leftists, they obviously haven't succeeded in all these years so might as well try something new.  But this goes even further to their rhetoric.  All our lives we've been told that higher taxes will make things better yet they just get worse and the government can't even spend our money well.  But they never think that they're wrong, much less try to come up with a better solution.

Southern Georgia Block Party Shooting Leaves 2 Dead and 35 Wounded – “It Was Gang-Related”
October 4, 2026

If you've read this far, my schedule is changing again so I'm not sure how it'll go this week.

Gosh Lois, how would I know where to find a 92Y?

Guatemalan Illegal Alien Sex Offender Arrested Twice in 18 Hours in New York Thanks to Sanctuary Policies
October 3, 2026

□ [“New Jersey College Student Sues, Professor Called Him ‘Racist’ for Trump Flag on Bedroom Wall"]

It's based on a 2021 incident on a zoomchat, probably during Covid, in case you're wondering how a professor go to see the student's bedroom.  She demanded he take the flag down before class could continue.

I'm very ambivalent on this.  Waiting five years is probably the biggest red flag.  If this was such a big deal, why did it take so long?  If it's about being too poor to get a lawyer, you'd have other problems to deal with along the way.  There's also just a fundamental opposition to lawsuits being used for anything.

That said, the left is fine with doing this so it's a valid weapon to use against them.  I'm not against the basic idea here, just the way it's being done here.  I'd like to see more pushback on things like this but the general public would need some specifics, detailed as simply as possible.

An obvious example is why did this take so long?  The legal system does take time, even for rich people.  There must be a way to clarify the basic steps required and how much time is involved on each.  I'm sure there are many possible variations and this would contradict explaining the process as simply as possible.

There's also differences in policies for each state and how the federal government fits into that.  When a lawsuit starts, the people involved must go quiet, that's infuriating to anyone paying attention to it.  This might be where a timeline of the process could be helpful, the process is going to take 'this long' no matter what.  I'm wondering if A.I. might be helpful, on the process or at least describing it.  The left has been doing this for a long time because they want this.  The right doesn't but it's something we should be more knowledgeable about.

King Charles Rebuffs Demands for Slavery Apology and Reparations Ahead of Caribbean Tour
October 3, 2026

□ [“Jane Doe Supporters Just Realized They Made a Huge Mistake"]

The information is already being leaked, the original reports and text messages.  Lucy Craig is her name.  She had texted the next day that it was all legal and she accepted the invitation to come back for another party.  That invitation was later cancelled and her sorority friends pointed out what a slut she was, that's when she got pissed off and started saying it was rape.  So of course she's not responsible for anything, it's always the man's fault.

This story is going to vanish very quickly and women won't even acknowledge that.  Lucy Craig is going to be hit like the black man on the Lindsay Clancy case.  Then another so-called scandal will erupt next week.  As far as I'm concerned, the 19th amendment is already past-tense, it's just a question of how long until everyone realizes it.  You can't trust these people to make decisions when they behave this way based on their gender and these are very clear ways to define a gender.

The fact that they both have L.C. initials is very strange, even their first names are pronounced to reflect those initials.  This looks deliberate but I go back-and-forth on if it's a deliberate plan by the matriarchs or if the Trump administration has figured out how to use them to carry this out.  It's the scheduling that really throws me, it's definitely being used for the mid-terms so this will just keep happening for the next month at-least.  Whoever's responsible, how do you even plan such a thing?

Then there's the question of gender.  How many women are really up for this, a brand-new collective rage every week?  I'm sure there are exceptions, some will, but most will get really tired of this.  It also occurs to me that we haven't heard much from Hillary, Michelle, Nancy, AOC, etc. for a few days.  It's possible they're kept entirely ignorant precisely to keep them out of this.  Next time one of them goes out for a speech, they'll be given a few lines to say and that'll be it from them.  That's what the elites are for.

Some men will fall for this, that's a given too.  Some are just weak.  That's not even a bad thing, so long as it's acknowledged as the truth.  What we're seeing here is almost unbelievable, a literal definition of the genders, men do this, women don't, and vice-versa.  The fact that women are so unanimous about this does indicate their fundamental 'goddess worship' (or demon-worshipping cult which may be the same thing) and we're watching it in real time.  I'm blanking on the phrase Trump used, effectively that we're at the 'dawn of a new age' and it looks like this was what he was talking about.  And we haven't even discussed those who pretend to have a new gender.

Leftist CEO of Wikipedia Admits Website Traffic is Cratering amid A.I. Revolution
October 3, 2026

□ [“Trump Says He Regrets Nominating Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett to the Supreme Court"]

Seriously?  This is one of those things that keeps Trump from being likeable.  You don't go out in public to complain about your own appointees.  You're supposed to know what you're doing so you're just giving people reason to oppose anything else you do.

He does accept a bit of the blame, he put them in.  He also points out that these justices don't vote uniformly the way the leftist ones do.  There's a lot of reasons why they might vote yes or no on a given case but the implication is that they're doing this on the merits of the case.  The arguments work against them being bribed or threatened because then they would just be uniform on their rulings.

As always, there's stuff about the courts which would make no sense to most of us.  I forget which case it was and don't even remember the specific terminology but individual justices can issue something below an actual verdict and even some of the leftist ones have favored Trump on theirs.  John Roberts issued one for Trump to delay a verdict, then ruled against Trump later on.  Then there's Roberts' ruling in favor of Obamacare where halfway through his decision, it looks like he's going on way, then he suddenly reverses it.  There's a reason people deliberately stay ignorant of the legal system because it gets very confusing very fast.

I don't know how this could be fixed.  I really don't want more justices added to the court and I'm fine with the concept of giving them a job for life.  Of course for decades I was fine with Congress getting re-elected as often as they could and only now am I leaning towards term limits, so maybe that'll change.  One way to minimize government is to make it its own problem and that's what the higher courts seem to be there for.

Broken Joe Biden Looks Frail at Event with Al Sharpton
October 3, 2026

□ [“Michigan Fire Fighters Union Quietly Pulls Abdul-El Sayed Endorsement, Then Scrubs Website"]

They say their endorsement was a 'clerical error.'  He's running for the Senate yet somehow they had intended to name a Michigan secretary of state instead.  You can't tell *those people* apart or something?  The rumor is that those running the union are leftist but the membership is not so there's a problem.

El Sayed seems to be having problems.  He's already promised higher health care prices for poor people under his plan, he's funded by George Soros, endorses shariat law, supports 9/11.  He even said recently that blacks and arabs don't get along well.  So it's starting to look like Democrats can't pull him across the victory line and are ready to stop trying.  But at least Kamala Harris likes him.

As always, "don't get cocky," but there are increasingly hints that people don't want what the left is pushing and that includes the new brand of 'muslim socialists.'  So if there's a chance to vote against it, that's what people will do.  Oh wait, that's happening for the next month.  I am fairly confident that results can only go one way in a fair election, I'm just not sure that's what's going to happen.  And no matter what, we can just expect this to get worse for the time being.

Three University of South Alabama Students Arrested for Social Media Threats Against Trump
October 3, 2026

Don't let the cat in. First you have one, then two, then five, then ten and soon they've taken over.

Michigan Woman Who Received Biden-Era Presidential Award Arrested in $1 Million Fraud Scheme
October 2, 2026

□ [“Texas Mom Charged with Capital Murder After Shooting Both Sons"]
□ [“Maine Man Tries to Run Over Conservative Reporter — Threatening With a Dangerous Weapon"]

Here we are, leftists are actively being violent.  This is what they've been trying to inspire.  There's no way to know how organized these people are.  Everything about these stories suggests they're all acting independently but we don't know what social media they pay attention to or what text messages they receive.  My guess is they are effectively individuals, their unity is more mental and spiritual, all behaving the same way in different locations like clones.

None of them seem to be Trump supporters, outraged by the upcoming mid-term loss that's guaranteed to happen.  Quite the opposite, they all seem to side with the leftists who promise they can predict the future and they'll win everything.  Some how that makes it ok to go out and kill people now.  The Texas mother's kids were 15 and 21, were they prominent MAGA or something?  Boys growing up in the internet age, obviously they see what women will do and had to get through puberty with that but it's not exactly a reason to murder them.

The collectivist mindset is almost becoming more visible by the day.  I don't pay close attention to what's going on pop culture and I've thought of any number of recent movie plots or celebrity behavior which matches up to this sort of violence.  I really need to start noting those example when I think of them and I'd bet others who focus more on new releases could think of even more.  I think this goes all the way up the ladder, probably the biggest example being Disney determined to destroy its largest franchises just to promote the *woke* agenda.

The main concern that comes to mind is how physically unified these people can become.  Can they actually group together as an active para-military force?  That seems unlikely so their biggest hope is to create so much chaos that only their masters are capable of saving us.  The other major concern is that they will call on other countries to invade and save them.  The struggle will continue to get worse unless and until our side shows up en masse to say we're not putting up with this anymore and are willing to shoot them if they don't accept that.

Biden Judge Rules Law That Makes It Illegal for Non-Citizens to Vote Is Unconstitutional!
October 2, 2026

Federal Judge Blocks Border Wall Construction in Big Bend Region in Texas
October 2, 2026

□ [“House Oversight Democrat in Sexual Relationship with YouTuber Tied to Influencer Program That Her Committee Investigates"]

I don't get the concept of "influencers" and don't remotely pay attention to whatever it is they're promoting.  But I heard recently that they're bringing in huge amounts of money which just makes this look a lot worse.  In this case, the Chorus Creator Incubator Program is a nonprofit that pushes leftist propaganda on the internet and pays its people up to $8000/month.  There are people who get paid a lot more, women doing sex videos for instance, and this just seems utterly unbelievable.

There's no product so what are you being paid for and where is the money coming from?  It's understandable when ingredients need to be produced and transported to a factory where they are manufactured into a product which needs to be transported to stores and advertise to the consumer.  The factory and vehicles would require maintenance, each task requires a crew and supervisors, there needs to be office workers overseeing the operations.  But that's not a business model where you decide to pay someone $8000/month to talk about you online.

My guess is this is basically a scam for the elites to funnel money around.  There might not be a lot of *real* money involved in this and even less of it might actually belong to the "influencers."  They probably don't know any better so they're out buying mansions and limos and assume the money will keep coming in forever.  That was my reaction to a recent anecdote about the sex video females getting hundreds of thousands per month and are totally broke.  Why would you buy a mansion for doing that?  Get a four-room apartment, masturbate on video in one room and in a few months you're set for the rest of your life.

Clearly there's a lot more going on here than we're being told about and that's what Congress is investigating.  Also clear is that Congress knows all they need to know and are totally involved with this.  And obviously it's limited to the elites because poor people just have no clue how this would work.  Even if they expect to get rich by making videos, they won't last very long and couldn't make much money.

A related part of that is things like the 'first time watching' videos on youtube which I have more than a little interest in.  I only pick my favorite movies as background noise but any number of times it sounds like these posters are accurately guessing what's going to happen too often.  They also work with advertisements and are clearly making something from this so there is an industry involved, it's just all online.  I've wondered how many of these people are wanna-be actors or otherwise connected to studios.  Or, just as likely, the studios are working together to develop marketing for a modern audience.

I got no idea where this will go but it doesn't sound like something that can last very long.  It's also another example of politicians and elites who get to ignore the rules they make up for everyone else.  

NBA Team Fires Broadcaster Same Day He Was Hired for ‘Racist’ ‘Sexist’ Tweets He Made as a Teen
October 2, 2026

□ [“911 call reveals concerns about well-being of 2 children found dead from starvation at home"]

Something about this story comes off as fake.  Specifically the fact that it takes place in South Carolina but the news article is posted on upper Michigan tv station website.  How would they even hear about it and why are they the first one to report this?  Sounds like a prime example of 'we're not getting the real story.'

Otherwise it's what you'd expect.  Neighbors in Charleston hadn't seen the kids for a few weeks, they called 911 who investigated and found their corpses.  The mother said she was unaware that not feeding kids led to starvation.  This is why "eugenics" was invented because stupid people can't be permitted to breed.  She says she stayed at home, did she even notice they were dead?  The mother presumably had enough to eat, where did she get the money for that?  Who paid for the house?

She's been arrested and is being held in the Al Cannon Detention Center which I had to look up to see if it's real and isn't Artificial Intelligence Cannon.  It also makes a convenient argument for government to intervene and make sure parents don't have any access to their children.  So yes, there is the immediate emotional disgust that anybody bothers to let her live another minute but there's also a sense that this is just invented to fill a narrative and has little-if-anything to do with reality.

And if it really happened, just as we're told it did, the 19th amendment will soon be past-tense.  There's simply no reason to put up with women if they do this and they will very quickly learn that they can't do anything without men.  That's quite possible even if this story is totally false, just listening to women over the last month or so has given men every reason to not be involved anymore.  If women fail to fix themselves, we will let them collapse and do nothing to save them.

Delaware University Penalizes Americans with High Tuition, ‘Illegal Aliens Over US Citizens’
October 2, 2026

□ [“Is France on the Brink?"]

We hope so but it's France so riots are a regular holiday.  It just feeds on itself, the left loves riots so they love France so France gets more riots.  And Muslims agree so there you go.  I'll just assume this applies to the rest of Europe but France is definitely a third-world nation at this point.  And they have no plans to fix anything.

At this point I'm not even sure what could be done.  The EU will hold every nation in stasis as long as it continues to exist which just gives the invaders more time to reproduce and take over.  Other than riots like this, I can't think of any real violence they'll need, it's just the natural way of things.  It's possible that native Europeans who want to resist will form tribes, sooner or later they'll be able to break away from the larger nation-state.  At that point they might be able to fight back against the invaders although that's depressingly similar to their chances during the first Muslim invasion.  And maybe the second, I know how far the Turks got but I never really looked into what they did in Eastern Europe.

I guess if there's an up-side, it's that those who want to resist can actually see the problem.  The rest are the ones most likely to fail and they won't even be that useful to the invaders.  They're taking up space and resources, they think they still have authority and the invaders need to go along with that or take over openly.  Of course there are a lot more down-sides, we don't know if *any* Europeans are willing to fight back, much less any signifigant number of them.

Gaza Health Ministry Releases Health Numbers Debunking Their Own Genocide Narrative
October 2, 2026

Having to write earlier makes it a lot harder to find stuff to write about.

93-Year-Old French Woman Raped and Strangled In Her Home by Naked Sudanese Man
October 1, 2026

□ [“Gavin Newsom Signs Order Declaring California Agencies Use the Term ‘Artificial Intelligence’"]

It's not as stupid as it sounds, or if it is, it's not totally on Newsom.  Apparently Trump put out at some point that the new technology should be called "Super Intelligence" so this is what Newsom is reacting to.  There are several things going on here, most or all of which fall into the 'why the f*ck are we bothering with this?' category.

Government needs to maintain its terms and word-definitions so that orders can come through clearly, along with reports, inventories, all the paperwork it loves producing.  The left has always loved changing those words and renaming things because History Bad!  Trump is actually fighting them on their grounds here but it's totally unclear why or what the point is.  The Gulf of America, Lake America, the Trump-Kennedy Center and now Super-Intelligence, we don't know if there's a legal reason or something else here.

Meanwhile Newsom is putting himself in pointless situations and doesn't seem to have any point other than Orange Man Bad.  He's deliberately defying the federal government's usage of the term and still imposing his will that California will say what he wants to hear.  Legally he has the same arguments as Trump so either they're both wrong or they're both right.  But in a leftist state like California, they use that argument in a lot more places, like promoting gender-equality between men and birthing-people.

As to using the term 'Super Intelligence,' I doubt it's about A.I. itself, except in the sense of predicting that it will massively change things.  That's definitely part of it but otherwise this seems to be the equivalent of re-defining drivers licenses as vehicle-operation licenses.  The fight is more about what government wants than what the citizens need and who gets to decide.

Migrant Youths Set French Schools on Fire, Douse Teachers in Gasoline, Hunt Police
October 1, 2026

□ [“Migrant Caravan Headed North Is Anticipating Democrat Win in Midterms"]

We've been hearing about this for a week or so.  It doesn't sound like this is a big deal but it sounds like it's trying to be a big deal, as if The Camp of the Saints was a training manual.  This comes across as being exactly how a military invasion works, down to the specific details, all without being an actual official military.  They organize, they're commanded, they travel through country after country to reach the target.  They're also expendable.

I'm sure a lot of people make the point but I'll just add this is also a blatant contradiction to the leftism that promotes it.  The US is evil and racist and oppressive and all that stuff, so why do they want to come here?  They aren't coming to fix things, they couldn't be bothered to do that with the countries they're all running away from.  If things are so bad in those countries then getting out was the priority, and they already did that.  The goal is escaping a housefire is not to move to another city.

The notion that this is about the mid-terms is just idiotic.  It's literally impossible for Democrats to steal enough elections to make a difference.  If nothing else, they wouldn't take office until January so the invaders would just have to sit around for months.  They'd still need the executive branch to carry out the legislation and, in case they've forgotten, Trump's not on the ballot so he'll still be there and his appointees.  It's like the left just imagines that they can do anything whenever they want.  Joe Biden couldn't open the borders until he had ended the Covid threat which he promised to do on Day One and that still took over two years.  Biden is probably still more competent and coherent than these people would be if they gained power.

Student Confronts Harvard Professor During Debate “I Hid Being Conservative Just to Graduate”
October 1, 2026

□ [“'Inshallah' Hasan Piker Brags the Left Controls Talarico"]

This is one of those things where people are being too honest too early.  Talarico was always a total leftist which doesn't seem to have a chance in Texas.  In the last few weeks, he's made some statements that his beliefs have change, or he didn't mean what he said before, stuff like that.  No reason for anybody to believe him but he keeps saying he's now a moderate.  And here influencer Piker admits he just says that to get elected and will completely comply with the left after taking power.

We see this constantly, none of the activists who claim to have moderated their beliefs explain how or why they did this.  Not even a few token sentences about weeks of internal struggle to challenge their own beliefs, they just say it's different now and that's it.  They can't even say it's a private decision they don't want to share because then why are they trying to impose their views on everyone through the government?  Not encouraging.

By the way, this could also just be hustling Piker and his ilk, that the candidate just says what *they* want to hear as a way to gain power.  Somehow that's never a possibility.  It's probably not a big problem, leftist incompetence is a better explanation of why they can't carry out the mission, but it's still a possibility that needs to be taken into account.  Instead the left just ignores it until later to whine about the failures, we see that as they bitch about how the government lawyers didn't persecute Trump and his people from 2021-24.  The people in charge weren't even good enough to make up the lies to justify doing this.

With Piker, I also assume he's basing this on Islam and its ability to dominate the infidel.  So in this case, I'm sure he's correct about Talarico.  Democrats know how to pick the empty shells to get votes and actual decisions will be made by people who weren't on the ballot.  I'd be interested in looking into how their spouses or other family members operate in a 'voice behind the throne' sort of way.  That's also why I'm curious about the influence of Islam and sexual exploitation behind-closed-doors.  I bet that explains a lot of Republicans too.

Obama Judge Rules Trump Cannot Fire Washington Court-Appointed Democrat US Attorney
October 1, 2026

Happy New Fiscal Year's Eve.

Couple Extradited from Mexico for Smuggling Children to US During Biden Administration
September 30, 2026

□ [“Houston Mother Kills Her 4-Year-Old Daughter After Custody Hearing, Turns the Gun on Herself"]
□ [“North Miami Beach Mom Ditches Infant and Three Other Kids for a Three-Day Carnival Cruise"]

These events just happened in the last few days.  They're not the only ones I've cited, I don't cite all the headlines and news stories I see and I'm not even paying close attention to this stuff.  It just give an impression that 'the spectre is rising.'  Women like these just feel obliged to carry out the murder and abuse because they can, they expect to be protected from consequences.  At least that's what the voices in their head tell them.

The Clancy case was in Massachusetts so by definition it's close to Salem.  They're basically on opposite sides of Boston from each other, an hour or so away.  Salem is most famous for teen girls making ridiculous accusations against people they didn't like and getting away with it.  And of course men get blamed for everything.  Easy to describe that as a 'spirit' that's been part of our nation from the very beginning.  In 2013, Obama signed an EO declaring Salem the birthplace of the National Guard.  From 2001 to 2022, Massachusetts has made a point of exonerating everyone who was convicted.  It's a double-edged sword, support the witches or support the demon-possessed cult attacking the witches.

All of a sudden social media is buzzing about some 2024 rape case at Cornell University.  It's in Ithaca, New York, not too far away but not close enough to be suspicious.  Cornell is a prestigious leftist school so my immediate impression was, assuming anything illegal actually happened, the students were protected until such time as they needed to be betrayed.  What little I've heard indicates that the female was totally consensual and everybody wanted to do something bad.  So of course suddenly the left is demanding punishment.

I also noticed that Ithaca and Salem are at basically the same latitude and roughly halfway between them (a little further north, at Albany) is Colonie, NY.  This was the source of the NXIVM conspiracy cult of rich sex-worshippers which hasn't gotten much attention for a while.  All these connections, all these upper-class leftists.  I doubt *all* the people in these individual cases went to Cornell or were specifically connected, but I also assume some of them were.  I'm trying to speculate on what they would be doing with each other and why.

That's what I mean about 'the spectre is rising,' this is what I think we're watching as these cases erupt in public, from the elites to the anonymous random citizens.  It's New England so it's as close as the US gets to Old England with historical sites everywhere you turn.  While writing this I spent more than a little time checking if Paul Revere or Plymouth Rock fit in, or any relevant Cornell graduates.  Nothing immediately grabbed me (is that the right phrase to use here?) and there's enough there that it would be easy to make up some connections that look factually correct.  That's probably why I keep putting this out, hoping that someone with more knowledge will see a pattern and reinforce it.  Good or bad, that's how we build things.

AOC Attempts To Push Free College Tuition While Attacking Baby Boomers & ICE
September 30, 2026

□ [“Senate Democrats Block Congressional Stock Trading Ban"]

Oh come on, it's not like the bill would start tomorrow with the new fiscal year, you'd still have plenty of time to make tons of profit and even to work out new contacts to handle your stock investments that aren't related to you.  But no, Democrats unanimously oppose not being able to get rich (richer) on the stock market.  Because they oppose capitalism.  They can't even demand to make sure they pay more in taxes for their investments.

Apparently this ban was connected to a 'voter id' bill.  If true, it just shows how corrupt Congress is.  There's no reason to put together these two separate items, they just did it so Democrats would vote against voter i.d. and use that for the campaign just as Republicans can use the stock-market trading.  This is an example of how they're working together against the rest of us.

I'm not saying this proves that A.I. will really help the American people but it would cut a lot of this stuff out.  They'd be too obvious in performing for their sycophants and ignoring any results they don't like.  A.I. would be able to either cut through all that or to just plow through every step in a couple minutes, exposing how ridiculous Congress is for behaving this way.  It's also why I really think Trump 2.0 has been able to plan what's happening.  Congress is informed and at least some have paid attention to it, they know they can't affect anything meaningfully so they're just showing off to stay in power.  Also to keep getting richer.

Tennessee Execution of Murderess Halted After “Serious Concerns” Are Raised – First Woman Executed in State in Over 200 Years
September 30, 2026

Among the 'goddess-worship' on social media, of course there's constant promotion of Kamala Harris as guaranteed to win in 2028.  I still suspect Democrats have already worked out that they need to remove her from the race before it gets started after the mid-terms.  There would just be too much they'd need to explain if she's still around by then.

But it is possible that they actually believe this.  As always, it's impossible to know how serious leftists are about what they claim to believe, or how much thought they've put into it, or if their actual goals have anything in common with what they claim to be going for.  But I have noted that they keep raving about how great and accomplished Harris is but never point to the next obvious challenge she'll face, the primaries.

That seems kind of strange because she's so obviously lacking on that.  Hillary Clinton ran for POTUS twice and had to fight through the primaries.  She lost to Obama the first time, giving up in early June, and had to fight Bernie the second time until early July.  Harris gave up in 2020 before the first votes were cast and faced no competition in 2024.  It's why I'm wondering what kind of cult behavior this is.  It's like either (a) it's oppressive for a woman to have the face the same competition as a man or (b) Hillary's already done it so every woman has automatically passed that test.  That's the situation Harris is being presented with here.

I'm very curious how her opponents will handle this.  Well, male opponents anyway.  If AOC runs, it'll be too obvious that there's no difference between them and they'd only be picked for gender and skin color.  But Harris would need to show that she could beat primary opponents even if they're male, which she's never done before.  And how are the male candidates supposed to attack a woman?  I'm guessing that's why Gavin Newsom has announced he's not running if she is.  They may have already had this agreement, she wins everything and he doesn't have to lift a finger or she loses and he comes in to save the day.  She was DA in San Francisco and California when Newsom was mayor and governor, it's not like they don't know each other extremely well.  And he can call Aunt Nancy for help.

So I want to see how Harris supporters (or leftists in general) react to this.  How do you even prepare for a campaign against fellow Democrats, whether they're the most awesome heroic candidate and you shouldn't bother running against her or if you're paid to point out her weaknesses despite what all your peers and media say.  "Orange Man Bad" isn't going to help.  Everybody raising their hands to show their support for illegal immigrants won't help.  At some point the candidates need to show that they're better candidates than the opponents and they need to work on that before the final election.

California College Lecturer Removed From Classroom After Rant About Student Question on Native Americans Using Alcohol
September 30, 2026

□ [“Iran Regime’s Public Statement:  IRGC Wants You to Vote Democrat!"]

As always, no idea if this is true.  Reportedly the regime has released a 25-page letter basically telling everyone to elect Democrats in the mid-terms.  I could see them doing this to cause chaos, not sure I believe that they're stupid enough to do it otherwise.  Unless it really is desperate.  There are also rumors that there are multiple attacks by ethnic tribes.  I'm blanking on which ones and can't find where I saw it but if it's not really happening, we're getting closer.

There's also more reports that gas prices are finally going down.  I have noticed it by a few cents or so each day although I'll wait to confirm that it's really happening.  Oil exports from the Middle East and/or going through the Strait have returned to 2025 levels.  That will definitely help and not just in the mid-terms.  A lot more needs to happen for it to really make a difference but this is a very good sign.

We still don't know yet how Russia and China are reacting to this.  It's truly been an amazing war, I can't think of any precedent.  We basically won right away but then didn't do anything to enforce our will.  There was very little risk to our troops and we haven't even gotten into the other effects in the Middle East, much less the world.  Whatever else you can complain about Trump, he made this happen and in fairly short order.  Tomorrow we'll start seeing the effects of the new Fiscal Year and if gas prices have gone down by a dollar or more in the next month, the flood to clean out the stables will have truly begun.

Justice Department Indicts 10 Non-Citizens for Illegally Voting in Minnesota
September 30, 2026