Drinking and drugs are much easier to give up than blogs.

May 25, 2025 Phil Robertson, Duck Dynasty patriarch, age 79
May 24, 2025 Peter David, comics writer, best known for The Hulk and X-Factor, age 68

Antifa and Transgender Activists Attack Christian Gathering in Seattle Park; Mayor Blames the Christians
May 25, 2025

Senator Mitch McConnell in Frail, Incapacitated Condition
May 25, 2025

Harvard Medical School Morgue Director Pleads Guilty to Trafficking Stolen Body Parts
May 24, 2025

Trump Calls for ‘Major Investigations’ Into Harris Campaign's Payments to Major Celebrities
May 19, 2025

Israel Preparing to Strike Iran’s Nuclear Facilities
May 20, 2025

CBS News President Abruptly Resigns Amid Trump’s $20 Billion Lawsuit For Deceptively Editing ’60 Minutes’ Interview with Kamala Harris
May 19, 2025

84-Year Old Black Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC) Insists Biden Could Have Served as President Until 2029
May 18, 2025

"Obama Bros" Podcast Admits That Democrats Are Screwed: ‘Rearranging Deck Chairs on the Titanic’
May 23, 2025

Saudi Arabia to lift booze ban at 600 tourist locations by 2026 to lure in holidaymakers ahead of World Cup
May 24, 2025

Driver Rams Through Liverpool Parade – Bodies Go Flying – 53-Year-Old Male Suspect in Custody
May 26, 2025

May 26, 2025 Charlie Rangel, former New York congressman, age 94
□ [“Macron’s Wife Brigitte Smacks Him in the Face on Plane in Vietnam, Refuses To Hold His Hand"]

The French.  Can't live with them, pass the beer nuts.  Can I get a 'whoa Bundy'?

An amusing clip.  The plane has landed and they're getting ready to exit, only Macron is visible in the doorway but he's clearly arguing with his wife and she smacks him in the face.  Three staff were standing there, two weren't paying direct attention them, the third was Vietnamese and she looks embarrassed for the Macrons.

There's already a government statement that the two of them were “relaxing” in a “moment of closeness” and “playfully teasing each other.”  Well, no, one of them had the sense to stay (mostly) out of public sight while doing this, the other one did not.  Since they have no record doing this in public, it means one of them was completely unaware that this was the time to be in a nice playful mood.  If it's a normal thing to do in public, that's one thing.  Otherwise you keep track of when you shouldn't do it.

Say the situation was reversed and she was the one being hit like this and he was the one staying mostly out of public view, would that still be a justifiable defense, just "teasing"?  I think not.  Leftist elites seem to be having a lot of stress these days.  Look at how quickly they needed to put out a lie about this even though the whole world could see the truth.

And yes, I do hear that Macron's wife is not of the 'female' type.  I probably believe that and she certainly doesn't look like a woman, but for convenience sake, I'll refer to her that way.  Unless I want to make fun of her.  What's she gonna do about it, get violent?

Democrats Hate That the Big Beautiful Bill Requires People to Work for Benefits
May 26, 2025

□ [“Democrats’ Proposed $20 Million Study on How to Reach Young Male Voters 'Speaking with American Men:  A Strategic Plan'"]

Hello my fellow pro-masculine dudemeisters!  I would like to f*ck some b*tches with you and discuss how important government-funded abortion is.  Can I get a 'party on!'?  [Note:  This doesn't seem to be very effective.  They are mostly ignoring me and going back to discussing how some team is throwing a "foot" ball with their hands.  Must googlesearch that later.]

There's probably going to be dozens of jokes and memes like that in a few days.  The whole concept is ludicrous and quite funny.  The party elites and strategists are meeting in expensive hotels to work out how to win back the working class men.  Why not ask the ones working at that hotel how to start?  Probably because they'd need to lie to you if they want to keep their jobs.

Or just look at the most obvious question, out of all the dozens and dozens of genders that Democrats absolutely support without hesitation, why is it so important to get this one petty group back?  You don't like or respect them anyway and have been very up-front about that for decades.  What would you think of a feminist who said she needed a man?

The goal is to “study the syntax, language and content that gains attention and virality in these spaces.”  These people are just throwing together words that might explain what men think.  They don't know what thought is, they're just making guesses based on feelings.  Right there, that's not what men do but it is what Democrats do.

Earlier today, before I saw this article, I had been wondering why Democrats aren't pushing Mr. Kamala Harris out in public, or that guy chosen to be her Veep.  I'm pretty sure at least one of them was cited as the modern day model for masculinity, or some term along those lines, so wouldn't they know what to do in this situation?  The answer is 'of course not.'  They totally submit to women and that's assuming either of them are heterosexual.

Even more amusing, I get the impression the whole party's still a long way away from even understanding this problem, much less figuring out what to do about it.  One experiment they could try is to run a candidate for total masculinity.  What would that take, to appeal only to men and not even try to appeal to anyone else?  Just go for a small town mayor or city council or something, but that could give some good lessons.  Or try it in several different cities around the country to see how different states operate and see what similarities there are.  See?  That's how thought works.

Texas Passes Law Mandating Ten Commandments in Public School Classrooms — Gov. Abbott Will Sign Into Law
May 26, 2025

□ [“FBI Reopens Investigation Into Cocaine Found at Biden White House"]

97% chance it was Hunter's or someone connected to him.  2% chance it was Joe.  1% it was someone else but they'd obviously be connected to the higher-ups.  It's the White House, you kinda need connections to get there.  So for convenience, I'm going to assume it was Hunter's.

If the Trump administration was actually going for a *win*, this would be a very easy one.  It's a felony on federal property, there's no chance that it happened so long ago that it's passed the statute of limitations.  This *could* be included in Joe's pardon, which he insisted he'd never do and was signed by autopen.  Seems like a pretty shaky defense if they get to court for that.  Just trying to get to court would make Hunter desperate.  He'd probably want some drugs and where's he going to get the money for that now?

So Hunter's got a lot of incentive to cave in.  And so does the Secret Service and anyone else who was responsible for covering this up.  I was always amused at how leftists said *maybe* it was left over from the Trump administration.  This was July 2023, what they are saying is that someone can plant something in a White House locker and it would be years before anybody notices it.  Russia could plant bombs in that locker and no one would know until it's too late.  I don't think the Secret Service is that stupid, that's why I assume it was Hunter's or one of his buddies.

So *if* there's a win, this would be an easy way to crack open the large criminal enterprise the Biden's have been part of, along with Democrats, DC and more.  They would also have to look into who used the autopen to sign everything, not just Hunter's pardon.  I don't like being so negative about whether this is a win or not but we've seen no progress on taking down the leftist tyranny dominating the world.  The clock is ticking.

Nashville’s Mayor Under Federal Investigation for ‘Aiding and Abetting’ Illegal Aliens
May 26, 2025

Baltic Countries commit 5% GDP to defense starting in 2026 for Russian threats and NATO demands
May 25, 2025

□ [“Chicago Mayor Invents Holiday, Wishes Everyone ‘Happy Africa Day’ on Memorial Day Weekend"]

Is he Muslim or just inspired by Muslims to think this land now belongs to foreigners?  He's not remotely pretending, this city doesn't self-identity as being part of the US and he's quite official about not hiring white people.  He even says blacks are the "most generous people on the planet," meaning they are superior based on their skin color.

If that's how you want to play it, that's fine.  I realized long ago that abortion would get much more support if it's publicized how blacks make up 40-50% of it which, given that they're less than 20% of the population, means they aren't going to increase in numbers.  But abortion is ok for them, they're not human and have no right to live.

We can go even further and forbid blacks from using anything invented by other races.  Cars, telephones, toilets...  You want to be in charge and "generous," let your people figure out how to do that.  This is the same problem leftists governments have when thinking men with guns can't fight back, you're the ones who set this policy, let's do it.

OpenAI’s o3 Model Disobeys Human Instructions During Tests and Sabotages Shutdown Mechanism
May 26, 2025