February 26, 2026
As usual, there's no context and very few hints of anything that was going on at the hearing. Hillary didn't even show up, she was at an office in New York, so apparently Congress was already sucking up to her. Not a good sign. The pic was just Hillary looking startled or shocked by what she was being asked. Or at least it appears that way, as a single image it could be anything. She wanted the hearing to be posted live so what's the difference?
The pic was taken by Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) who leaked it to a podcaster who posted it online. On first glance, that sounds incredibly stupid and against House rules. So all she did was give Hillary an excuse to bail out. Hillary did return but there's no reason to think she was any more cooperative than she's been any other time in her life. Since we know nothing else about this hearing, there's no reason to say anything nice about Boebert.
That said, there are a couple of very vague hints that this might have been for a purpose. “No U.S. ambassadors were harmed in the taking of today’s photo.” This is most-likely a reference to the death of ambassador Christopher Stevens in Libya thanks to Hillary, and they blamed all that on some internet video. As Hillary would say, what, at this point, difference does it make?
So it's a valid question, how did they know about it? Can't post online in a Congressional hearing, I'm sure there are federal agents to keep an eye out for anyone doing that, but how did Hillary's lawyer know that? Where they tracking this podcaster? And even there, it provides more reason that you really should go to Congress in person to testify. Lots of spies out there. So it's possible this is a reference to what Hillary's State Department was actually doing. She also said they asked about 'Pizzagate' and completely dismissed that.
Nothing about this looks good and I doubt it'll be any better tomorrow when (if) Bill shows up. For the last 35 years, the Clintons have gotten off-the-hook for everything so there's no reason to think that will change. There's just the very small hope that maybe this leaked pic actually meant something and wasn't just as stupid as it seems.
February 26, 2026
An increasing number of elites keep getting caught by this. It really does come off as Trump's delay was to get the left more and more obsessed with this and now it's backfiring on them. This guy was Norwegian, there's been a few of those exposed for their Epstein-connections. Their emails were from 2018 discussing how to promote globalism, using the WEF and Trilateral Commission.
Epstein was arrested for molesting children in almost a decade before that, do none of these people do any background checks? Bill Gates is in the same situation, apologizing for knowing Epstein who hooked him up with Russian whores. Not long ago, it was that there were no Russian whores and Gates sex life wasn't relevant to his connection with Epstein, hadn't been to the island or anything. What will he have to apologize for next?
I forget who pointed it out but none of these people are talking about what a great conversationalist Epstein was or his presence and charisma. Most of them are very rich themselves so they can't even fall back on 'I just wanted his money.' But they unanimously insist that this had nothing to do with raping children. There are many thousands of people on the planet who would be just be just as good at email chat but they all picked the same guy. If it wasn't about sex, they're just admitting how easy they are to control.
There will be more celebrities exposed for this. I'm waiting for Matt Groening. It's known that he was on Epstein's plane with at least one child. There are a few others I'm curious about hearing from but other than some big-name rockstars, they would be lower-down the ladder. It's pretty clear that this wasn't just about sex with children because these rich people could do that elsewhere, so when are they going to expose what was actually going on? Even P. Diddy finally came out as just paying chicks to take drugs and get banged in front of people.
February 26, 2026
A follow-up from Trump's comment, they're calling her out. This might get entertaining. Even some Democrats clapped when he mentioned Nancy and they've clearly had problems. She had filed for re-election just a week or so after 2024 but announced a few months ago that she would not run again. Her party needs to pretend it opposes rich people and considering how rich she's become as a government employee, it just looks bad.
The impression is that Trump easily won the battle over the SOTU. Not so much for what he said but for how Democrats refused to do anything that might show support for American citizens. Even a few people in the party are saying that's not a good look for them, showing that none of them will side with us when it comes down to it.
But as always, the big worry is that it was just talk. He deserved applause for some of his statements but we still have no evidence they'll go anywhere. That's about the biggest argument there is about following Trump with Vance or Rubio, or even bothering with the mid-terms. Given what is on the verge of being exposed and how little time there is to do anything about it, there's really no long-term benefit for the economy or the war. Democrats can seize power and reverse it any time.
February 26, 2026
The agent asked why he was driving alone along the border, the suspect fled and eventually shot back at the agent near the port of entry. This is one of those things that just seems pointless to even think about, why was he driving along next to the border? Maybe he was just out for a drive, maybe running an errand, but then freaks out when being asked about it. I used to live next to the border and although I never did anything suspicious, I'd have known that there's a reason to ask basic questions like this and not try to shoot anyone while I'm fleeing. It's just common sense.
These people are both overwhelming in how destructive they're willing to be as well as a vast minority. I don't know if it's all A.I. but suddenly every third post on Facebook is about how oppressed the trans are and everybody must obey them and we're not allowed to say anything they don't like. Doesn't seem to be winning people over although again, it might all be A.I.
I'm sure there's more going on but at some level, it just looks like the trans are both expendable foot soldiers for the left but also the source of their denial of reality. They've always aimed towards this but for most of history there wasn't mass awareness of biology and chromosomes so they had to rely on envying the rich or advocating a collectivist government they were in charge of. I know it's more complicated than that, it's just the way this movement effectively appeared out of nowhere and was immediately enormous, suggesting that our masters had intended to impose it on us all along.
February 26, 2026
No comments:
Post a Comment