You'll read this and like it!

Hundreds of Illegals Detained with Active Voting Cards, Bragging about Controlling US Elections
April 3, 2025

□ [“Macron Urges French and European Companies To Freeze Investment in the US Over Trump's 20% Tariffs on EU Imports"]

This just strikes me a collectivist demanding obedience and the subject matter is just whatever's most convenient.  Suddenly nationalism is important to them, as we see in the US with leftists suddenly praising the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, even Washington and Jefferson specifically.  It was only a few months ago that America was evil and needed to be destroyed.  Macron's in a similar situation although the effort to destroy France and Europe has been going on for much longer.

He's trying to keep businesses from moving to the US and get away from France/EU regulations.  But he's not coming up with incentive to stop them, doing that would mean helping other business in Europe too, just like Trump is doing here.  If they could do that, why are they opposing Trump?  If they can't, then they're still an easy target for China and the invading immigrants, who are suddenly losing money from the US, so they'll need to make up for it anyway.

What other options are there?  Promote the war with Russia?  If anything, that's going to push more people away from the EU.  Macron demands everyone be united under him but doesn't provide any reason or incentive.  They already spent decades letting the US do all the real work, there's nothing to show for that.

□ [“Canada’s PM Mark Carney Flip-Flops — Now Calls U.S. 'Our Most Important Security Ally'"]

A few days ago he was all how the old relationship between our countries was over.  He didn't say "The old relationship we had with the United States—based on deepening integration of our economies and tight security and military cooperation—is over, *EXCEPT* for being our ally.  The US is absolutely our ally.  It’s our ally in security and defense partnerships.  It’s our most important security ally."

If he'd said that, it would have come off a bit weird.  Apparently putting several days in-between the first and last part of that statement is supposed to be relevant.  We've already seen this with Canada and Mexico for the last three months, they're full of talk but when push comes to shove, they go with the US.  Unless they want to be left with the EU, South America and China.

With the EU elites trying to get into a war, Canada probably realizes that they'd get the worst out of every part of this.  They'd be obligated to contribute, without the US helping.  They're a lot further away from Russia [at least if you don't look west] so they've got a lot less incentive to join a war to defend someone that isn't an ally who's already lost against a nuclear power.  Canadians will be running to the US to avoid the draft.  Carney might even have to face an election!

U.S. Treasury and Hotel Washington Evacuated After Suspicious Package Found Near White House
April 3, 2025

□ [“Judge Boasberg Considers Holding Trump Officials in Contempt for Not Bringing Killers, Criminals, Gang-Bangers Back to US"]

The battle gets closer.  Boasberg is clearly the frontman at the moment.  Whether he was installed or just next in line, he's obviously not holding back.  He'll give orders and expects them to be obeyed or you'll be punished.  Interesting that he's not singling out Trump here, that would be the obvious target.  But the POTUS might not be directly in his grasp.

Maybe they're hoping this is the first step, then whoever Boasberg attacks will open up and give them something to use against Trump.  That's the only thing I could think of but it does seem like something Trump and his staff would have prepared for.  I also think they know who in Boasberg's sphere of influence was getting funding from USAID and related groups.  For that matter, when they were going after Trump last year, it just looked to me like most judges knew there was nothing to go with so they had to keep trying until they found someone stupid enough.  That may explain Boasberg.

But what is supposed to happen here?  I can't think of any precedent anywhere and it's not like the Trump administration sees any reason to cooperate.  Democrats don't have much to work with so it's not clear what they're trying to do.  Trump would have picked his people knowing whether or not they'd fall for this.  Only leftists will believe the media who says he's losing here so that won't go anywhere.

The Supreme Court is the real question.  They can't live in isolation, there must be connections with the rest of the federal government.  This has to have been discussed before and it must be under discussion now.  Are they in on the plan or are they waiting to hear from their sponsors?  And how long until their decision is public?  To the public, I'm not sure it'll make much difference either way, but I assume the elites have them set up for a crucial decision.  And so we're all waiting...

Georgia Democrats Storm Out of Chamber Over Bill to End State-Funded Sex Changes for Prison Inmates
April 3, 2025

□ [“Chuck Grassley and Democrat Introduce Legislation to Upend President's Tariff Authority"]

Now here's an actual strike by the uniparty.  This bill would require the POTUS to give complete explanation of tariffs to Congress and, if they don't vote approval, will expire within 60 days.  This may be one of those times when a "Republican" bill is only supported by Democrats.  We'll see how many other RINOs will go along with it.

Tariffs are being used to replace taxes and oppose the 'new world order' so there's lots of opposition.  Big businesses that invest in all politicians would want tariffs dropped.  This may be the real motivation for the uniparty, along with all the foreign interests and corruption.  Leftists will forget for the time being that they supposedly oppose big businesses, just as they used to support Tesla for saving the earth.

This is the strongest move Congress has at the moment.  We'll see if it makes it through the Senate, and then the House, and then past Trump's veto.  The odds are slim but this is possible.  We might find that the quarrels are more relevant than this actual bill.

Just looked it up, Grassley is 91 years old.  He's been in Congress since before I was born and he's been a professional politician since my father was 8 years old.  And this is who Democrats are turning to now.

Young American Female Fencer Refuses to Fence a Transgender Man, Is Banned From Competition
April 3, 2025