I came, I saw, I retweeted!

Tulsi Gabbard Slashes Over 40% of the Office of Director of National Intelligence Staff
August 20, 2025

□ [“Adam Schiff Starts a Legal Defense Fundraise As He Senses the Walls Are Closing In"]

You can do that?  It seems like all he'd need to do is specify where his primary residence is, is it in the state he was elected in where you're legally required to be a resident to be elected or the state he said was his primary residence because it makes mortgages cheaper for the homes you buy?  One simple answer there would solve all these problems, but here he is asking his allies for money.  He's not poor, why does he need other people to pay for his problems?  Oh right, he's a Democrat in Congress from whatever state he self-identifies with at the moment.

There seems to be quite a bit of this.  Federal Reserve Governor Lisa D. Cook had similar actions and is under investigation.  As a member of the Federal Reserve Board since 2022, apparently she's legally required to live in DC, but has been buying property in Michigan and Georgia, getting mortgages for the residents of those states.  New York Attorney General Letitia James has already been under investigation for false claims about properties she owns.

Yet they said 'the law applies to everyone' when they went after Trump for this.  What's changed?  I'm deliberately not looking up the specifics, but to get loans and/or mortgages, Trump made technically false claims about his properties.  He repaid whatever it was but, according to Democrats, you must be punished for that.  Trump or his supporters made the point that 'everybody does this!' but that didn't matter.  So here you are.

I don't remember and won't bother checking if the case against Trump went anywhere or if it was just placed on hold after it failed to prevent him from winning the presidency.  Of course these Democrats doing the same thing won't remotely get the same attention for it, even though 'the law applies to everybody.'  But, as a white male, Schiff should really be answering these questions in public instead of begging other people to fund his defense.  Unfortunately even California's not going to require him to obey the law.

Serbian Protests Intensify with Clashes and Vandalism Against Ruling Party Offices
August 20, 2025

□ [“'Let Trump Take Over' Inner City D.C. Residents Say Crime is Bad!"]

Well there are *some* negros that don't need to be treated equally by Democrats.  But this could explain why they're mostly ignoring this, at least to the extent they aren't openly opposed to it.  How do you explain to your devoted voter base that they're wrong for wanting to be safe?  But that said, the master is going to need to say something or there's gonna be trouble.

I don't know if these are brand-new or if this has been happening for several days, but I've been wondering when people with cameras were going to start asking people in DC what they think of this.  I mean going around the streets and asking, not just inviting a safely obedient servant to join you in your studio and broadcast to the world how he's against Trump.  But that would be why the official media is ignoring this.

I've also wondered how long it will last.  From Vance's statements, it sounds like it can go on for 30 days, then it'll need Congressional approval.  I definitely think it'll need to go on longer, I'm sure Republicans will vote for that, but then we'll get to see where Democrats stand.  That could be hilarious, how many will actually speak out and say they want the crime back?

There also must be an increasing number of people in other cities willing to speak out and ask why Trump can take care of this in a few weeks and Democrats have just made things worse for years.  Trump's also been dealing with the wars and the border and the economy.  Their leaders focused on gender pronouns and increasing taxes but ignored the murder and rape because priorities!!!

“Whites Can’t Invent Anything!” – Joy Reid Says Whites Stole Ideas and Inventions From Blacks
August 19, 2025

DHS Paints Southern Border Wall Black, Making it Too Hot to Climb
August 19, 2025

Maduro Vows to Deploy 4.5 Million Militia to Counter US ‘Outlandish Threats' to Venezuela
August 20, 2025

□ [“‘Drowsy’ Joe Biden Had to be ‘Prodded’ Into Answering Questions in 2023 60 Minutes Interview"]

This was done about the time of his interview with Special Counsel Robert Hur who said Biden was too senile to prosecute for anything.  I wonder if there's anything official or unofficial about doing interviews like this during an investigation.  Maybe it was just whoever's in charge deciding that Biden needed to prove he was up to the job.  Which he wasn't, but they'd cover that up.

Well putting it that way, wtf are these people thinking?  You've got to pretend someone is doing fine and then hide the results so you can justify keeping him in charge (nominally) and run for a re-election that he'd said he wasn't supposed to do and would eventually get kicked out of anyway.  It's very easy to see things that might go wrong on any step of the process.  It's even easier when there is no coherent process, wtf were they even trying to do here?

I'm not the first to point this out but this is why we keep assuming leftists have actual plans.  We've met enough of them in our lives to know that they aren't stupid enough to do this, so why do they do this?  You need to protect Biden, so you push him in public, so you ignore it, so you push him for re-election, so you replace him at the worse moment.  And this is just what we saw publicly, along with articles like this coming out a couple years later.  What were the leftist elites doing to each other about this just to get through each step?  This is why I assume they're all part of a demon-worshipping cult.  It just seems like the most likely explanation.

Sharia Law Sneaks into Austria:  Court Greenlights Islamic Arbitration
August 20, 2025

□ [“Target’s Woke CEO Resigns Amid Declining Sales"]

These *woke* businesses are just strange.  It's been a couple years since Bud Lite represented this movement going over the hill, as they paid a trans guy tons of money to convince people to avoid their beer.  All the customer wants is a cheap beer, they don't need these adds, but the company did it anyway and lost their place at the top of the market, along with all that precious store space.  By all accounts, they aren't getting it back, although it's rumored that they're trying to get Sydney Sweeney to do ads for them.

That should have been a valuable lesson for every business out there, don't piss off your customers.  Yet ever since then, every single months, another large corporation has decided to join in and they fail big-time.  At least it's understandable in Hollywood where they have to suck up to the self-absorbed activist celebrities they hire, but those businesses with a mostly working-class customer base, how can they still see this as inviting a disaster?

Just today there was news about the Cracker Barrel restaurant chain suddenly changing their old logo.  There's nothing about the new one that looks *woke* but it's still idiotic, what's the point of changing something that's worked so well for so long?  The people in charge always have the answer that they're trying to find a 'new' audience, which is what all the others said when they ditched their old audience and went broke as a result.

It would make sense if this all happened at the same time, or if the first one had been a success so the others followed that pattern.  But this is just one disjointed failure after another, like the business executives are doing everything they can to ignore what's happened to other businesses.  The phrase 'get woke, go broke' has been around for a few years for a reason, how is it possible to avoid learning from that and how did anyone who does that get put in charge of big business?

Clinton Judge Rejects DOJ’s Request to Unseal Epstein Documents
August 20, 2025