Are they doing this deliberately or just too stupid to know any better?

□ [“U.S.-Based Chinese Scientists Violate Government Policy by Continuing to Collaborate with China’s Military, thus Acting Contrary to American National Security Interests"]

That only matters if we haven't ceded our national independence to an unelected group of leftists China is in control of.  But we have, so these scientists can now obey China and ignore US laws, there won't be any punishment.  We've already seen that, Biden pretended to ban scientists from the Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences in 2021, yet here they are.

Is it just a show for the masses or did Biden's people really think they were going to ban the taxpayer-funded military medical scientists from the US?  Either way, China obviously knew how to handle it, by ignoring the US government except for getting taxpayer money.  This may be why it's finally being admitted that the virus came from China.  Not that that matters now.

China's just going to behave like they're automatically in charge of everything, and our rulers have obeyed them up through now so that's not going to change.  That's worked for China all these millennia so why change now?

President Xi Jinping Wins Third Term in China in a Unanimous Vote
March 11, 2023

Mexico’s Socialist President Lopez Obrador Threatens to Interfere in American Elections – Announces Plan to Ensure “Not One Vote” Goes to Republicans
March 11, 2023

LA Times Says White Drivers Cause Air Pollution in Los Angeles Which Negatively Impacts People of Color
March 10, 2023

Michigan State Shooter’s Note Released: Blames ‘Racism’, Lack of Sex, for Killings
March 10, 2023

San Diego ‘Teacher of the Year’ Arrested at School, Charged with Child Sex Abuse and Child Pornography
March 10, 2023

The IRS Reminds Thieves That They Have to Pay Taxes on Stolen Property
March 10, 2023

NYC Mayor Eric Adams Now Wants Taxpayers to Send Illegal Immigrants to College
March 10, 2023

□ [“Fears Rise that Silicon Valley Bank Might Only Be the Beginning of Bank Failures"]

The next disaster has arrived, the largest bank failure since 2008.  I don't pretend to know anything about economics so really all I do is look at who's doing what and trying to figure out why in ways that have nothing to do with economics.  For instance, I've always wondered if the 2008 collapse was an excuse to make people desperate for Obama to fix everything.  Couldn't do it for Hillary in 2016 because then Obama would be blamed and she was already planning her victory celebrations.

Anyway, I'm currently curious about which famous people are currently taking the hit.  I've heard Oprah Winfrey has lost a lot, as have the former British royalty Harry+Meghan.  I suspect they haven't lost *everything* just because they're way too rich to be able to store everything in one place, but I may be wrong.  If these people are involved here, then a lot of others would be there too.  I'm also wondering when we're going to hear that it's all Russia's fault, because everything else is.

We also learn that the young, dark-skinned lesbian in charge of the bank's "risk management" included nothing about her work for a bank's risk management, but she made sure everyone knew her skin color and sexual preference.  Who else would you hire to avoid risks?  If she had any stock or money in this bank, she's probably made sure to get it out quickly, like a lot of high-ranking managers did.  They knew what was coming, even if they kept it hidden from the customers.

There's also someone paid to go on CNBC and recently said how well the bank was doing.  He'll probably be asked a few questions since he's white and possibly not gay.  [well, he's on CNBC, so, you know...]  Did he really have no idea what he was talking about or was he blatantly lying to his audience?  No matter how many times you fly a plane well, it takes only one crash to be considered a bad pilot, if you survive.

So now all bank customers will be worried, as will all the people in charge of banks.  At least those who actually work for the banks and aren't paid by the government.  Since the government invents all the money in existence, they may just buy the banks.  Of course taxes will go up but that's what our masters want.

The federal government insures bank accounts up to $250,000.  From what we're hearing, very few Silicon Valley accounts were below $250 grand, so those who weren't informed ahead of time to get their money out took a huge hit.  All I have to go on is the name, but Silicon Valley itself had a lot of very rich leftists, so losing this local bank would hurt quite a bit.  As far as I know, most people don't have multiple bank accounts in different banks, although those who work internationally probably do.  What would be the point?  So if they lose this, or if other banks start collapsing, that's losing everything all of a sudden.

Those who are ready to panic now have an excuse.  Those who were looking to exploit those who panic are ready to move.  There's the people who lived paycheck-by-paycheck who really have no idea what they're going to do in a week or two.  Then there's the people who live off the government, how are they going to respond?  Obedient or utterly nuts?  Then there's the government itself moving in, which they'll do even if the other banks don't collapse.

Some people have been preparing for this.  Most of them probably helped to cause it, but it's possible there are some who aren't.  Does anybody miss the happy go-lucky days of 2022 yet?

Still No Video: More Photos of Fetterman at Hospital Released as Staff Issues Statement Claiming Senator Is "Working With My Colleagues"
March 11, 2023

St. Louis Battlehawks Athletic Trainer in Early 20s Dies Suddenly at Team Hotel
March 11, 2023

□ [“China Helps Iran and Saudi Arabia Reestablish Diplomatic Relations"]

Iran is China's ally and Saudi wants to be part of BRICS so they have lots to talk about.  China wants the fuel to come through safely.  It's not like anyone is willing to rely on the US.  At best, they're willing to exploit it and that's all our rulers are good for.

What does this mean for Saudi and Iran?  Saudi has Mecca, a detail which rarely seems to be mentioned when anyone talks about them.  But like it or not, that is a very important detail to everybody in the region, except Israel.  The Saudis had ruled it for a couple centuries and nobody cared, then in the 20th century oil was discovered and that had become a big deal by then.  Meanwhile, Iran has several thousand years of history in addition to being Shi-ite, so they have a perspective few other nations no the planet could even come close to.

Other than going along with China, at least in the short-term, I don't have any idea where this will go.  BRICS is trying to form another option to US hegemony and, with full leftist support, that seems to be what they're doing at the moment.  As far as I know, leftists like John Kerry, Al Gore and Hollywood don't have anything bad to say about BRICS.  Are they employees or just mindless puppets?

Dutch Government Sends In Military Trucks and Military Gear as Farmers Plan the Biggest Demonstration Yet After Government Closes 3,000 Farms Due to Global Warming
March 11, 2023

Biden Takes Off to Delaware For Another Weekend Vacation – 40% of His Presidency on Vacation with No Visitor Logs
March 10, 2023

□ [“COVID Origin Declassification Bill Sent To Biden’s Desk – Will He Sign It?"]

What is going on?  The House and the Senate have unanimously voted to release the info on the virus coming from a Chinese lab?  Unanimously???  How is it possible for all of them to agree on that?  Either something big is about to happen and they need to get people ready for it right away or this is just the next step in the master's plan.  I'm ambivalent on which option is more likely.

I assume Biden will sign it, it would be suicidal if he didn't.  Or just incredibly stupid so I'm not going to absolutely guarantee he'll sign it.  He probably will but he may need to show that he'll defy Congress like Trump supposedly did all the time.  Or he may have just gotten orders to not sign it, giving Congress an excuse to get rid of him.

But just the fact that this is happening at all is utterly bizarre.  You think there'd be 20-30 minimum in both houses who'd vote against this bill for any number of reasons.  Remember, we used to be told that the virus was totally natural and totally deadly and anybody who said otherwise needed to be silenced, by some of the people supporting this bill.  What has changed?

Kamala Harris Brings Environmentalist Hysteria to New Low, Claims Climate is Causing This Illness Among Young People
March 11, 2023