The world always ends when I'm taking a shower!

Resolution to Remove Troops From Syria Fails to Pass Through the House, as Majority of Both Parties Vote Against it
March 9, 2023

Biden Calls Trump “the Former President and Maybe the Future President” During Lie and Gaffe-Ridden Speech
March 9, 2023

□ [“National Archives Retrieved Nine Boxes of Biden Documents From Boston Office"]

Once again, something is definitely going on here.  Can't say Biden is so helpful because then you have to ask why he took all these documents in the first place.  Or whoever took them, why didn't Biden just return them when this whole thing started?  Why didn't he start going through all his homes and offices to look if he had anything else?

My theory is still that this is based on info from the documents taken in the Mar-a Lago raid.  I'm just guessing so in theory, it's technically possible I might be slightly around about something.  But really, it does look like someone had tricked the rulers into this attack when they had no clue what it would reveal about them.

Looking it up, there was some discussion before the raid itself, so that may have part of the plan, although it's not clear who was working with who or what the target was.  Were they actually going after Trump or did they just want to make it look that way?  It's the FBI so there is a chance this might have been a disguise.  I know it's the FBI but come on, it's the FBI!

□ [“Mitch McConnell Suffered Concussion in Fall at Former Trump Hotel, Will Remain Hospitalized for Observation and Treatment:"]

Another Senator is taken down.  The guy is older than Biden, why is he still there?  Is this some sort of attack on the leaders or just a regular occurrence for old people?  Of course the media says they're all having normal health problems, they'll be just fine, so that's suspicious right there.

I'm not counting, but I think this means Democrats are back in control of the Senate, to the extent they weren't already with all the pseudo-Republicans, like McConnell.  Not like it'll make a difference anyway, Biden makes all the decisions, or at least passes them on from whoever's in charge of him.

Why have Democrats always insist they're all about the young and yet the people saying this are so old.?  Step aside and let someone else take over.  Just a couple years ago they were complaining about Ruth Bader Ginsberg, although they waited until after she died to complain.  Before then, she was totally healthy and would be around for a long time.

Michigan Bans Chinese App TikTok From State Devices But Governor Gretchen Whitmer is Exempted
March 8, 2023

□ [“Jill Biden’s Primetime Special Was CNN’s Worst Weekday Performance in Nearly One Year"]

They aren't trying to find an audience, that much is clear.  I do not get how they stay in business but it has nothing to do with the audience.  They only reason they aren't a private network is because they were founded by Ted Turner in 1980 and owned by AOL/Time-Warner since 1996.  They're part of the basic cable system so anyone who gets cable can watch it.  Once in a while, someone even does.  But if that wasn't there, they could just promote themselves to their own people just as they are now.

They use Jill instead of her husband because they need someone who can at least be coherent for a couple hours of filming, but that's not enough to make people want to watch.  The advertisers must be given deals somewhere else because why else would they buy ads for this?  Then again, why would they buy ads on CNN, or cable in general?  People walking through an airport will be so hypnotized by whatever you're selling that they'll remember to spend money on it after they get to their destination?

How much did they have to pay her to be on this show?  That would be part of the budget right there.  It's probably some form of bribery since it's not like they could get an audience.  But that's not what the tv network is there for.

Sudden Increase in Sleep-Related Infant Deaths Alarms Baltimore City and County Officials
March 9, 2023

□ [“Former J6 Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson Claims He Didn’t Have Access to January 6 Footage"]

Members of Congress don't have access to film footage taken in Congress of supposed-attacks on Congress and they just accept that?  They just trust what they're told and make decisions based on that?  Would Republicans have accepted that treatment if they'd been permitted on the committee?

I haven't paid much attention to this stuff for the last couple years but it really is coming across as a deliberate fake and our rulers knew that their followers were stupid enough to automatically believe it.  Otherwise they'd have to wonder why they've claimed it was proof of an insurrection if they'd never actually seen it.  Can't point to the people who got killed by the attack.  Can't even point to the weapons the attackers were using.  You had cameras filming all of that but you can't use it?

You know the media reported on you, right?  They covered your committee's work based on footage you weren't permitted to see, according to whoever made that decisions.  So the media is reporting your falsehoods that you told them because you couldn't be bothered to find the truth.  That doesn't make you look good.

You're the coup, you project your actions onto others and want them punished for it, and all the elite agree with you on that.  Because that's how much you care about democracy.

□ [“Big Media Joins Forces to Give the US, Germany and the West a Way Out of Ukraine"]

Why is this coming out now?  Suddenly it was all Ukraine who destroyed the pipeline but nobody in charge had anything to do with it.  And this comes out just after Germany's prime minister visits the White House?  What did they do, say that either Ukraine gets blamed or Germany leaves NATO?

So it's those crazy Ukrainians who did it now.  It's definitely strange why they don't just blame Russia for it like they do for everything else, even if there is an obvious response that Russia could have just shut the pipeline down without breaking it.  But you also have to ask if the Ukrainians just used the weapons the US was sending over, or get the US money to buy them?  I still haven't seen any Ukraine supporter admitting that the US government openly said they'd destroy the pipeline, that would be an obvious connection to look into.  If they were interested.

You don't just go diving hundreds of feet below water in an arctic sea and you can't just be holding the thousands and thousands of pounds of explosives required for such damage.  You'd need a lot of expensive equipment and support crews to do it.  There's no way to do this that doesn't look suspicious and anybody watching over the pipeline would have noticed it.  Now would Russia be the only ones performing security.

“We’re Done” – Newsom Shuts Walgreens Out of California Business, Won’t Renew $54 Million Contract Over Decision to Stop Selling Abortion Pills in Some States
March 8, 2023

Here We Go: Great Britain Government Requires Home-Grown Chickens to be Registered to Tackle Bird Flu
March 9, 2023