18 May, 2025

Make Autobots Great Again, vote for Tron!

20250517 Someone criticized me "Some of the European countries have just jacked their defense spending up to higher levels than ours because they know Russia is a definite and real threat, and Trump is abandoning Europe to side with Russia. Some are talking about getting nuclear missiles."

1: Is there any proof they've increased military spending or are they just saying they did? Is that going to mean tax increases or are they cutting other government spending to compensate?

2: Is there any footage of young men in line at the recruitment centers, ready to die for Charles and the Muslim immigrants, or are they going straight to a draft? I

3: Will these new soldiers be given guns, unlike the rest of the citizenry? If they're going to get weapons, they can use them here at home. What's the government doing about that?

4: I'm sure in 1985, you could just walk into a store and buy nuclear missiles, but in 2025 they're a little hard to come by. It's going to take a long time to build those, so how will the government protect itself until those are established?

5: These are all obvious problems that just leap out when you put any thought to them, there's probably many other problems in wait for these new military forces. That means a lot of things can go very wrong before the government even gets around to declaring the war they're so eager for. The fact that they didn't start this three years ago is a huge red flag and it doesn't sound like they've even noticed that. Is anyone in the government pointing out how stupid they were for not starting this earlier?

6: What incentive does anyone have to go along with this urge for war? Are they going to compensate by getting all the Muslim immigrants to join along with the transgenders and homosexuals?

Tim Walz Compares ICE Agents to ‘Modern Day Gestapo’
May 18, 2025

□ [“Biden Diagnosed with Aggressive Form of Prostate Cancer – Spread to His Bones"]

It was a little over a year ago that we were told how healthy he was so he was totally capable of running for POTUS.  This makes you wonder if anyone even looked at him for the last couple years.  Maybe not, if they did see him they might have to answer how they missed his senility.  The White House doctor probably wanted to avoid embarrassment if he actually checks how Biden is doing.

Just a quick internet search but it sounds like prostate cancer takes years to develop.  You get medical exams right before leaving the military, you'd think an 82-year old leaving the White House would at least be checked out before he walks out the door.  Pretty soon they'll add this to the reasons he decided not to run again.  It might even be most believable to say he was diagnosed last July - when he got covid for the 2nd or 3rd time - and it was just too embarrassing to mention it until now.

But it sure is a shock that all of a sudden he'll probably be dead any day.  He can't be bothered with any questions about how senile he is, he's got to get to Iraq to see Beau one last time!  Sure, this means Democrats won't have to answer any questions about how he's doing, but that won't stop people from pointing out what horrible shape Biden was in and they still went out to lie about it.

Pretty sure the health of the POTUS is something that's supposed to be released to the public.  Of course Biden's Secretary of Defense was able to go completely missing for days because of health issues and nobody even noticed he was gone.  And this is how Democrats want things run.

Spanish Canary Island Tourists Cower in Hotels and Airbnb Rentals as Anti-Tourist Thousands Protest
May 18, 2025

□ [“Patel and Bongino Uncovered Hidden Russiagate Documents - 'Give Us a Week Or Two'"]

Oh.  Boy.  They've found stuff that they can't tell us about.  Just like all the other stuff they've had that we can't be told about.  Gotta keep the public from knowing anything.  So why bother making this announcement?  Why not just keep quiet about it, then wait a week or so and you can release it all?  WTF is the point of this meaningless tease?

I really don't trust the FBI and these two aren't helping.  By extension, they're giving reasons not to trust the Trump administration.  Or even if you can trust them, you can't rely on them.  It's been almost nine years since this Russiagate nonsense started and we really don't know any more about now than we did before.  Trump's been POTUS for almost half that time and was getting tons of attention when he wasn't.  Enough with the secrecy!

And they just found it now?  Who's supposed to believe that?  They've been in office for months and that's not counting the first Trump administration.  Even if this stuff was hidden, that means whoever was hiding it was working against the administration and should be arrested.  I'd like to believe that they're actually ahead of the game and they're just now getting around to making it public, but this is ridiculous.

□ [“DOJ Confirms Plan to Make It Easier to Prosecute Corrupt Members of Congress"]

Current DOJ policy requires approval by the Public Integrity Section.  This covers other politicians, not just Congress.  It also applies to their campaigns and official jobs, not other things they get into.  The point seems to be to change DOJ policy.

I assume that's going to be immediately opposed by leftists saying Trump is a tyrant.  Agree with Trump or not, that's a good point.  And how would this work?  I would think the nature of the three branches means the Executive can't just start arresting Congress or Supreme Court no matter what.  Otherwise why not do that anyway?

Other politicians are less important but the issue is still the same.  I just don't see how this will work, unless it's already been covered by all three branches behind closed doors.  But keep in mind, we still aren't seeing any major arrests of anybody for anything that's been going on all this time.  We keep hearing things are about to happen and they never do.

Leading BLM Activist Busted Trying to Meet Child For Sex
May 17, 2025

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Only Hires Blacks Because They're More ‘Generous’ Than Whites
May 18, 2025

□ [“AOC’s Constituent Says She Ditched Her Own Town Hall When Asked About Crime in the District"]

Well violent crime in her district has gone up 70% in the last few years.  Why would she have anything to say about that?  She gets to fly around in expensive planes with an old man, that's way more important.  Maybe you should have asked her how 'defund the police' was working, since she promoted that a few years ago.

But that's why it's a solid Democrat district, they'll vote for her no matter what.  She hasn't even been doing much with town halls anymore.  This seems to be typical for Democrats, they start handing out with rich people and realize they like that much more than dealing with all the poor people.  And now she's got a job for life so she can do whatever it takes to become one of those rich people.

And right now, it looks like the party's trying to install her as the next candidate for POTUS.  Because Trump is such a dictator that you can prepare for the next election years in advance and nobody who votes Democrat will see any contradiction there.  And if her constituents have to suffer, she's fine with that.

Hillary Clinton Slams Urging Americans to Have More Babies, Argues That’s What Immigrants Are For
May 18, 2025

No comments: