I, Pencil. You, Jane.

Germany’s Dark Future: 80% Non-German Births by 2070—Voters Increasingly Turn to AfD for Answers
July 20, 2025

□ [“Barack Obama Says Boys Need Gay Friends and Mentors"]

And gays need boys.  They realllly NEED boys around, to be close to.  To teach them things.  He doesn't mention any legal age requirements, no sense that this boy is too young.  There's none of that around Obama.  Are we sure he didn't go to P. Diddy parties?

It's starting to look like the whole point was to pretend Obama was straight.  There's a reason we started being told there were brand-new genders in his second term, after he didn't have to run for reelection.  Notice that none of the activist leftists we've had to put up with since had the slightest objection to him pretending not to be with them.

And this is what he's starting with to fight Trump?  Not a good plan.  Most Americans are sick of that stuff anyway and the fact that he's been pretending otherwise all these years isn't good.  Where was he a few years ago when the trans movement was at its peak, why didn't he come out say he wanted everyone to support this, especially blacks?

Having said all that, I'm not sure this will be relevant.  Obama always avoided making decisions as much as possible.  He votes "present."  As we see with the new info on the 'Russiagate' scandal, he was informed about it but wasn't actually doing anything himself.  That fact that he's going this way, pushing gays on boys, will just show most people how far away he is from real life.  Typical leftism.

□ [“MSNBC:  Obama Should Hold a Press Conference Every Time Trump Says Something ‘Crazy’"]

But the media puppets are already trying to push this.  It's been almost a decade since Obama was relevant but Democrats have almost nobody else to go with.  AOC and Bernie are not going to convince actual Americans, only leftist freaks.  To his credit, Obama was capable of acting like, as Joe Biden said, “the first mainstream African-American who is articulate” but that a long time ago.  He hasn't spent a decade in his several mansions staying in practice so expecting him to lead a 'shadow government' is going to be a disaster.

Lawsuit Accuses Harvard of Protecting, Rewarding Violent Anti-Semites Who Attacked a Jewish Student
July 20, 2025

□ [“DNI Tulsi Gabbard:  Whistleblowers Who Crafted Phony Russia Report Turning in Affidavits to DOJ"]

If true - and it's depressing to realize that this might as false as everything else - this could be an interesting turn of events.  The 'deep state' can provide a lot of tools to use against whoever the new enemy might be, but there's also a lot of people who might see the winds changing direction and don't want to get punished.

Documents are already being put out.  I think, I haven't seen a link to 'read these.'  They're also government documents so we can expect them to be tedious and unreadable.  It's possible that most of these might be limited to very high-ranking officials, so the lower-ranks get told that "Russia!  Russia!  Russia!" is the real threat.  It was noted that people didn't really see a threat until the meeting in early January where it suddenly became Russia buying ads on Facebook in December, January, February, had stolen the election.  Liberals believed this.

It's also rumored that documents will be released next week covering the 2022 Mar-a-Lago raid.  I've long assumed that this was a trap Trump had set up.  As POTUS, he had declassified the documents, but the left refused to believe that, so what they found had shocked them.  They certainly never found anything to prosecute him for.  So if this rumor is true, we may see what the actual trap was.

It may also cover the email Susan Rice sent to herself on the day Trump took office.  I'd forgotten about that.  Easy to do, since we had never been given any real meaning or purpose for it, recapping the January 5 meeting in the Oval Office.  I'd have to go back and check my coverage of what this was about but I'm pretty sure we weren't told anything relevant.  She did it to cover up for something but we don't know how or why.

□ [“Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT) Demands Gabbard Halt Release of Deep State Docs"]

This just comes off as hysteria.  Gabbard is spreading a “dangerous lie” and John Brennan is in danger from “MAGA mouth breathers.”  He even repeats that idiocy about ads on Facebook doing something and says the intelligence community is watching their leaders to bad things right now.  This just comes off as someone who, if you have to choose to be on his side or the current leaders, you pick the leaders and maybe turn in an affidavit on what these Democrats did.

Then he says it's about Epstein.  In 4-6 weeks they'll try to prosecute Obama for this and no judge will take the case.  So we'll be in "Epstein's world."  This guy is just bouncing all over the place.  Another example of the side you don't really want to be on.

□ [“Texts and Emails Show Hillary Campaign Coordinated with White House for Trump-Russia Hoax"]

Ok.  What are you going to do about it?  This is stuff we already knew but I guess it's nice to have evidence.  So now what?  They're obviously going to keep pushing this but it doesn't seem like the right way.  If the best evidence is tedious government files then maybe it'll matter legally but it has no chance in the court of public opinion.

We've wanted to jail Hillary for thirty years and there's no reason to expect that will happen now.  Or Obama.  Or any of their crew.  John Kerry?  Joe Biden?  Bill Clinton?  Just to cover a few big names.  Then there's all the others, and all the foreign agents.  If we're gonna do this, ok, but I don't see how any of this is going to work out well for anyone.

Trump Says “No Amnesty” but “Work Program” for Illegals on Farms? – “Streamlining” Work Visa Programs
July 8, 2025

CNN Data Analyst Declares Elon Musk’s New Third Party is ‘Pretty Much Dead on Arrival’
July 19, 2025

Trump Firings Hit Massive Total:  Federal Workforce Plummets By Over 22,000
July 20, 2025

□ [“Democrats Keep Praising Stephen Colbert, They’re Proving Why the Late Show Failed"]

Paying attention to a tv propaganda show I never saw.  I can't even keep track of these network stars, that's how out-of-date I am.  But suddenly Democrats aren't finding their propaganda outlets so they're all speaking out in public.  The guy lost $40 million a year for his network but they don't mention that.  I don't think they care how much money a business loses.

It's possible the networks will have to tell Democrats the truth.  In private of course, but they can't keep wasting this money on leftist propaganda.  No one was watching anyway.  If the show had any merit there are cheaper ways to do it but not as a CBS tv network.  Leftists do seem to be obsessed with tv networks and movie studios, especially the old ones.  Long-established big businesses, they're much more willing to recite what the government wants to hear.  And they require government approval for companies to merge.

I'm guessing the media does have some deeper, more long-ranging plans for their product.  Back when I had cable, I watched very few of the channels and I'm guessing that's common.  But most of those channels were only able to exist because they were part of that cable deal.  I don't know how the internet has changed things.  We liked youtube but then they added tons of ridiculous commercials.  So far streaming is a total disaster.  I'm guessing someone will need to figure out a way to combine cable and streaming and make sure people have more choice to which channels they want.

Syrian Massacre of Druze Marks Third Major Attack on Minorities in Just Seven Months
July 20, 2025

Japan’s ‘Trump Inspired’ Rightwing Surge Leads to Crushing Defeat of Liberal PM Ishiba
July 20, 2025