16 January, 2025

Trump's second term was the greatest presidency ever. Too soon?

Bob Uecker, baseball player, broadcaster, age 90Januarhy 16, 2025
David Lynch, movie director, age 78 20250116

Sweden To Change Constitution, Remove Citizenship From Fraudulent Migrants and Threats to the State
January 16, 2025

□ [“Pelosi to Skip Trump’s Inauguration"]

I don't think she's just doing it to be rude.  I'm sure that's part of it but it's not all.  There's also the fact that she's extremely weak and probably can't move that much.  Other than an appearance to certify that Trump won the election, I don't think she's been seen in public since she drunkenly fell down the stairs.  I can understand not having anything left to prove but then why is she still in Congress if she can just give people orders in private?

Which leads to might be the main reason she's not attending.  At noon on Monday, Trump will have all the legal and military authority he needs for whatever plans he's been making all these years.  He'll also have high-level security and agents following his orders.  I hope they're going to immediately start moving on the human traffickers and their operatives, everybody who works for them at every level.  That would include government officials.

Michelle Obama isn't attending either.  There may be a connection.  Maybe you can't join the uniparty if you're not part of the cult, and a lot of people have joined.  There's also the bizarre need to treat every woman like a goddess, so they have to compete with each other for that.  Still just a theory, but if I'm right and Trump really did have a 12 year plan to start as POTUS in 2017, this may be where he intended to eradicate as many of the enemy as possible, and they spent the last four years lining up as a target.  No wonder Nancy and Michelle don't want to be around.

United Nations Renews Push for Globalized Digital Marking System to Deal with ‘Emergencies’
January 16, 2025

□ [“Kamala Harris Snubs JD Vance’s Family Tour of New Official Residence"]

They're moving to town and it's traditional for the outgoing veep to show the incoming residents where they'll be living, but Harris won't let them in.  That shows how caring and helpful she is.  No wonder liberals liked her, or at least pretended to.  It looks like most people have started ignoring her too.  She doesn't need to look good, it's not like she has any future plans.

But it sounds like she'll be bringing in money somehow.  Haven't heard anything about an investigation of her finances.  She magically got $20 million for a book she won't even read.  In early December, the DNC was even worried because people got so much money from her campaign, that they were obviously scamming it, which means keeping the money from the donors.  That's bad, but it seems to have gone away.

There's not as much going on as I might have expected.  The right isn't celebrating or getting ready to take over, the left has stopped promising to kill themselves.  Something is going on but it's not clear what and we're all pretty tired of this.  This is where I get worried that, whether by bribe or threat, Trump is actually working for the rulers.  Or maybe he wants to look like he is and it's all a trick.  There's no way to know, it's all a guess, that's the high level they're working at.

Biden claims that climate change is responsible for the fires in California
January 16, 2025

□ [“Trump Says He Has No Interest in Hiring Anyone Who Worked for Koch, Bolton, Pence, the Cheneys, Haley, Ryan, Romney, or Milley"]

Interesting.  If true, a good start.  The fact that I have to say "if true" shows how unreliable the news is these days, but anyway, there should be a lot more people on this list.  More importantly, they should be made public, that this person worked for Liz Cheney or whoever and that's why they can't be hired by the government.  I don't know if there's any precedence for this sort of thing and it might be used badly, but it's a way of listing who the enemy is.

I keep saying this but one of the most infuriating things about WWIII is that we're never given any sense of who's on our side or even what the sides are.  Either these people are responsible for the evil cults running the world or they're tools by those cults to lead us to this point.  Whether or not the "deep state" is a separate group doesn't matter, they're part of it too.

So what will the government officials do about this?  There must be some options, particularly in blue states and cities, but what can they really do?  The high-ranking people on the list - or the ones who should be but aren't - can call China or Antifa or BLM to use as thugs.  I still assume these people have plans and have only a few days left to prepare.

Leftist Washington Post Cartoonist Arrested For Possession of Child Pornography
January 16, 2025

□ [“Trump Taps Jon Voight, Mel Gibson, and Sylvester Stallone as Ambassadors to Usher in a New ‘Golden Age of Hollywood’"]

But then Trump says or does something that makes you wonder what he's been smoking.  Hollywood needs to be burned to the ground and even if you were going to pick any "ambassadors," basically anybody famous should be off the list.  I know some celebrities are less left-wing than others but frankly I don't trust any of them.

And what are they supposed to do?  To an extent, Hollywood itself is already an anachronism and that's only going to grow.  At one point, you could see studios finding it convenient to be in the same place where they could utilize the same cast and crews and all the companies needed to supply what they were doing, but a lot of that could just be done on a cellphone now.  Use a laptop if you want to get really complicated.

To the extent Hollywood still exists or is needed, why would the government be involved?  Trump is supposed to reduce what they're doing, not expand like this.  It just comes off as a hoax or a waste of time and money.  Every time Trump does something that looks like a great idea, he does something like this.

House Passes Bill to Deport Illegal Aliens Who Sexually Assault Women and Abuse Children — 145 Democrats Vote No
January 16, 2025

No comments: