Why do you think they call it 'dope'? I dunno, I must be an idiot.

I've been thinking about "barter,"  trade without an agreed form of exchange.  The insanity of thinking money is evil would only allow for barter.  Sure, they think everything will be free but it's obvious that's not remotely doable.

Farmers can't grow food for free, food can't be delivered to cities for free or be issued so people can eat every day for free.  There's the creation and distribution of the tools required to farm, deliver food from the farms and refrigerating it until you want some milk and cheese.  The people producing those plows, trucks and ovens need to eat too.  Then there's the tools required to manufacture a tractor, fuel a truck, build a store or wherever you intend to store this food while you're waiting to give it away for free.  Are there thieves?  Hungry animals?  That's going to require more jobs done by more people who require different tools.

Is everybody wearing clothes?  That's going to require a whole different level of supplies, tools, deliveries.  They'll need buildings.  That's already a level where "barter" wouldn't work for the population of a town, much less a city or a large city, much less the rest of the world.  Do they think computers with internet access will be made by trading with others for food and shoes and indoor toilets?

It occurred to me that the problem is basically that of a baby crying and immediately getting attention.  Most people grow up and realize that there are others with their own lives.  As an explanation, this is way too simple but there does seem to be something too it, that socialists think crying should get them whatever they want.  This is quite possibly where emotion rules, or an individual grows out of it.

So the people ruled by their emotion hate anything that doesn't just give people stuff now, without regard to how any of this came to exist.  Like I said, that's still too simple but it does actually fit the explanation I've been trying to figure out, babies that never really grew up.

As individuals, it is possible for them to actually grow up and change for the better.  It could also be why, as groups, they what to shut down anything that could make them change for the better.  They already have what they want, or they don't which is why they're crying.

Obviously a certain amount of maturity is required just to add to your age, so they do 'grow up' in a technical sense regardless.  And that's where my speculation gets stopped again, as always.  Why don't they mature in any real sense except possibly as individuals which their group-mentality opposes from the start?  It does make sense that all these centuries of progress are about working out the best way to have babies grow up to be kids who grow up to be adults but individuals-as-groups are always going to leave enough leeway for groups-as-individuals to take power and tear apart everything they can.

Then there's the concept of 'time' which is not 'money' but there is definitely a connection between the two.

Seattle School Board Defends Segregating Meetings by Skin Color
March 2, 2022

Senate Republicans Strike Down Biden’s Healthcare Worker Vaccine Mandate in 49-44 Vote - Biden Will Veto
March 2, 2022

□ [“An Honest Mistake: Joe Biden’s Face Appears in Live TV Report about Elderly Man Accused of Touching a Young Girl"]

Now this is an interesting coincidence.  A Pittsburgh news show started a report about a 71-year old feeling up a 12-year old at Walmart and they showed an image of Biden behind the newscaster.  She undoubtedly didn't know it but suddenly they moved to a different camera to show one of the other newscasters, just for a split second, and then returned to her where the image was gone.

How do they get to that?  'Don't use a picture of some random old guy touching children, pick someone famous instead.  Who also touches children.  That's why we're the news!'

Maybe the people setting up the show weren't paying close attention and figured 'oh, they finally got Biden' when the news came out.  Or maybe it's a reaction to the stolen election.  Think of the possibilities!

So how is the Convoy doing these days?  [Yes, there's more than one but for simplicity's sake, I'm just referring to it as "the Convoy."]  It wasn't getting much attention anyway but suddenly all the news focuses on Russia.  If Russia is so dangerous, that'll give the government more excuse to take away freedom, won't it?  What an amazing coincidence, now it's *treason* to disagree with the government.  Why didn't Trump think of that?

Really, that's an example of why I think they've had this planned for a while and Putin was right in the middle of the planning sessions.  Even if leftists don't have a clue what kind of resistance they can face, he does, and the most obvious solution would be to have KGB agents forming it to sucker others into going along and getting caught.