Let's cross the bridge now, why wait until we get there?

NASA Pledges to Put Woman and Person of Color on the Moon in 2025 — White Men May Not Apply
February 28, 2022

40 Kilometer-Long Russian Convoy of Trucks and Tanks Is Heading towards Kiev, Ukraine
February 28, 2022

High School Assistant Principal in Michigan Is Able to Return to Work While Awaiting Trial For First-Degree Child Sex Assault
February 28, 2022

□ [“Six More Trucker Convoys Plan on Merging With ‘The People’s Convoy’ When It Reaches Indianapolis – Organizers Expect Over 10,000 Vehicles to Join the Already 3,000-Strong Group"]

All I care about is that they aren't bringing supplies.  Shut this motherfucker down.

That said, only 3000 and they're over half-way?  That barely even makes a fraction.  10,000 isn't much better.  This isn't encouraging.

And a Russian convoy is going to Kiev?  Whose side are they on?

I keep pointing this out but there's no clear sides or purposes for any of this.  The Infallible Leader of the US said last December that Russia wouldn't invade Ukraine.  He said last August that the Taliban would not take over Afghanistan.  He said in 2020 he had a plan to stop the virus and bring everybody's lives to normal and hasn't even started doing that.  Now he says there's no chance of nukes being launched.  He doesn't even say 'I was wrong all those other times but this time I actually know what I'm talking about.'

It's not the only examples.  Hillary made sure Russia owned uranium mines in the US for the state-owned Uranium One corporation.  That company was founded on January 2, 1997, just as Bill Clinton was starting his second term and they pay him a lot of money to waste airplane fuel to go over to Moscow to give speeches.  Obama promised Russia he'd give up US nukes with "more flexibility after the election" and in 2005 supported a Senate bill to disarm Ukraine, weapons which, obviously, they would like to be able to use now.  Of course none of them interfered in the 2014 invasion when Trump was POTUS.  [I think that's when he was POTUS which would explain why Obama, Biden, Hillary and co. did nothing.  What other explanation is there?]

□ [“US Senate Republicans Release Video Announcing 'We Stand With Ukraine' – Ignore Stolen 2020 Presidential Election"]

Is there any reason to stand against Ukraine than this?  Other than leftists, Hollywood and the media saying the same thing?  We didn't stand with them last time, why is this time different?  If they really mean it this time, they could declare war right now.

Oh, they don't mean it that much, it's just stuff to say on tv?  They'll pretend sanctions work this time?  They're going to stop buying Russian fuel?  Oh, they don't care that much.  Well can the DF families getting paid bigtime by Ukraine for all these decades give the money back so it can buy supplies?  Hell no!

So what are you going to do besides a war, 'police action' or whatever they call it now?  Nothing, that's what.  The media will sure enjoy that.  They wouldn't be complaining if Russia invaded Taiwan.

For that matter, they've also dropped a lot of attention they were giving they were giving to the virus.  It's almost like they knew people were sick and tired of being sick and tired so they put this in line to forces on us.

Meanwhile the economy is still falling apart.  I noticed this with milk, the expiration dates are getting closer to the day we see it in the store, assuming they aren't passed.  I looked at some today and only saw a few bottles that didn't expire in February.

Wisconsin Special Counsel Michael Gableman Calls for Decertification of Wisconsin 2020 Election Results
March 1, 2022

□ [“Facebook, Twitter, Google, TikTok, Netflix Block Content From All Russian Media Outlets Following EU’s Demands"]

They wait for Europe to give orders, not the US, and Europe can't do anything without Russian energy.  At least the US could if it wanted to.  It's this sort of thing that makes the war seem basically unreal for most of us.  We're all just drifting and putting up with whichever media is obeying whichever ruler to impose their version of uniformity on the world.

After all, the media has had no objection to all the years the US has spent bombing Syria, or Yemen, Somalia or Pakistan.  They claimed to not like bombing Afghanistan and Iraq but...

It's a given that they're going to try to infiltrate the Convoys, assuming they haven't already.  It'll be a bit tricky, there's not too many people who can fake being able to actually ride a truck and I'm sure the truckers will keep track of who actually came along for the ride and who just showed up on foot and claimed to have been a supporter all along.

Still, that's definitely a problem coming up.  And we still don't really get why they're doing this.  Protest by not driving trucks, that'll have the same effect.  This really doesn't make any sense.  Is there some sort of collective that they operate on which most people don't even know exists and that's the level they're aimed at?  I've dealt with a lot of them in my life and never saw anything like that.  Obviously I was focused on my job and they were focused on theirs but I wanted them loaded up/unloaded as soon as possible so I could get back to something else.  Sign whatever paperwork they need from me or I need from them, ok.  Thanks, have a nice day, bye, that's all that's needed.

Of course I'm not sociable so there could be more conversation going on but still, the idea that there's some level of contact truckers are at the heart of is the only possibility I see for this Convoy.  Agreements with the unions, maybe.  Anybody working with the supply chain will know the importance of transporting large quantities of items but I don't see anything that leads to a "let's go to Washington DC en masse" decision.

New York State Study Shows That Vaccine Only Had 12% Efficacy In Producing Resistance to Omicron in Kids
March 1, 2022

D.C. Schools Maintain Indoor Mask Mandate in Defiance of CDC Guidance
March 1, 2022

Pelosi Claims Americans Have a Low Opinion of Joe Biden Because They are Ignorant
March 1, 2022

In other news, I've decided to adapt my publishing to the current era.  For the time being, as long as I can, I'll just combine my essays every eight pages or so and send pdfs to whoever I can.  I'd like to make money on it but the ideas are more important.  So every week or so, there'll be a new pamphlet named after the date of the last essay.

Then every month or so, I'll combine the recent pamphlets into a larger booklet.  I'll have edited and modified them as need-be and will include the daily news headlines as usual for my books, so it'll basically just be a shorter version of those with all the formatting readers are accustomed to.  I plan to title each booklet with the month of release and an actual title just to keep track of them.

And God willing, a couple of times a year, I will have edited and combined the booklets into a normal book, with further updating, editing and so-on.  As much as anything, I want to give this work as much promotion as possible while it's still, well, possible.

There may be some fine-tuning needed.  Maybe I'll put them on Amazon every two weeks or maybe I'll reprint material from previous books to increase the pagecount.  Minimum price is $2.99 and I don't like the idea of charging that much for eight pages.  I do like the idea of having a release every week so that much will probably stay.