If you want, I'll be more assertive.

Nicki Minaj Teams Up with UN Ambassador Mike Waltz to Spotlight Slaughter of Christians in Nigeria
November 18, 2025

I haven't seen any big, bright stars at night for a while.  I think Texas stole them.20251118
□ [“Senate Unanimously Passes Epstein Files Transparency Act – Bill Now Heads to Trump’s Desk"]

Well we'll see if this goes anywhere.  Democrats are already trying to figure out ways to defend themselves just from what's already being said.  The obvious question is why these weren't released under Biden.  Their answer is that there was still an ongoing investigation so that couldn't be interrupted.  First of all, if we pretend Biden was the POTUS, he could interrupt it.  Second of all, that investigation didn't go anywhere.  Third of all, they would love to leak info about Trump to set him up.  Didn't have a problem getting his taxes and the media heavily promoted those.  Which leads to fourth of all, why weren't any Democrats demanding to know about this?  Because Trump was the only target, everybody else has to be ignored.

□ [“Harvard President, Obama/Clinton Economist, Larry Summers Steps Back From Public Commitments ‘To Rebuild Trust and Repair Relationships’"]

One of the first names to come out of whatever's been released so far.  He was emailing Epstein in 2019 for advise on attracting a woman, a Chinese economist he was mentoring.  Summers was in his mid-60s at that point, he still needs advice on talking to girls and that's who he turned to?  The guy who was convicted as a sex offender in 2011?  And he waits until now to feel ashamed about it?  Epstein's been dead for over six years, we don't give the impression Summers had any regrets about their relationship until this week.

The black female member of Congress is being put up for censure for texting Epstein while at a Congressional hearing to go after Trump.  Of course she just throws a fit, saying that it was just some random constituent she was getting instructions from, like she didn't even know who she was talking to.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries was also begging Epstein for money in 2013, again after his previous conviction.  He has more authority than Plaskett - assuming he's not just Nancy Pelosi's puppet - so he'll be able to withstand obvious questions about WTF he was thinking but not sure that'll last long.  And then there's the Clintons who are defying Congressional subpoenas to explain themselves on this.  All they can rely on is their fellow Democrats who spent the last several months demanding *everything* be released to the public.

Maine Judge Prevents Mother from Taking Daughter to Church or Even Reading the Bible
November 18, 2025

□ [“Six Congressional Democrats Call for ‘Soft Coup,’ Demand Military Defy Trump's Orders"]

That would be treason but Democrats want that.  They can defy Congress too with the same justification.  So how much do these people really want the military to use its power on the government?  I don't think these people are thinking about this as much as they should.  Even spookier, they're all on the military and intelligence committees.

Commenters are already citing the laws and regulations they're breaking and the military could use for their treason.  'Don't obey illegal orders' but do what these people are telling you to do?  Sounds like a contradiction.  At this point, I'm convinced these people don't know what they're doing, they're just saying whatever they're told to.

Over in NYC, a similar thing is happening, with the new mayor insisting he'll defy federal law to arrest ICE agents, and arrest the Israeli PM if he ever shows up.  He doesn't point to any actual crime and certainly can't point to any authority he has but that doesn't matter because he's a wealthy leftist Muslim.  Put all of that together, along with ignoring laws, trying to overthrow the government and install your own elites in charge of everybody...  How do these people think this will actually happen?

The fact that they haven't been able to actually do this yet suggests it's guaranteed to fail, unless China or whoever get involved and those nations are on the defensive too these days.  I'd like to believe that these people have, unconsciously, eliminated their own basis for power so they'll be the ones removed by this.  Legally or otherwise, these members of Congress can be eliminated by their own arguments and by any means necessary.  But they don't even realize that yet.

40% of Rent-Controlled Housing in NYC Occupied is By Foreign Born Population
November 18, 2025

□ [“Senator Cory Booker Calls for Schumer’s Removal — ‘Time For New Leadership’ in Senate"]

The internal fighting continues.  They'd have to fight against their own leaders, then fight amongst each other to replace them.  Then they'd suddenly realize that they're missing quite a bit of experience and seniority.  Trump's the excuse but face it, he could be replaced by anything and they'd still be as obsessed and self-destructive.

And what's Schumer going to do?  He'll fight, obviously, but he's already being set-up to be in the same position Joe Biden was less than a year and a half ago.  He can't even blame senility, as far as we know.  I don't recall if I ever predicted the old people would be purged like this but I and many others have pointed out how sick the younger generation were of these people hogging the leadership spots.

There's a reason politics is supposed to be an 'old person's game.'  Young men are out earning a living and building a family.  It's the old men who's family has grown up and formed on who can see how these things have worked together over many years, they're the ones who are supposed to be involved.  Of course that also requires government to be as minimal as possible so they're still competing against each other and not imposing their will on the rest of us.

New Jersey Mayor and Police Sergeant Arrested For Sexual Assault of a Minor He Met on Social Media
November 18, 2025

□ [“Outrage Erupts After Judge Releases Two Murder Suspects Without Requiring Any Bail Payment"]

Recently judges seem to be going out of their way to show their commitment to the activist cause.  It's not clear if they're just that self-absorbed or if they really think they're the highest relevant power.  They certainly don't expect any consequences if they're wrong.

It's also not clear how organized they are.  In several states, judges have forbidden redistricting but there's been no problems when liberal states do that.  One could probably make a convincing argument either way whether they all come to the same conclusion individually or if they all got together and agreed this is what they'll do.

I assume that's one reason the Supreme Court hasn't really spoken out on any of this.  Pretty sure there are secret plans in place to deal with war or national emergency.  Those plans would have been made back when there were rational men in charge so the Supremes probably have a valid reason to not get involved unless they have to.  There's also the point that the judge shouldn't be so involved and, if any court in the nation understands that, it's probably the Supremes.

But we really need to put a stop to these activists in robes.  Their limits should be made clear and they will need to face consequences for these decisions.  Releasing violent criminals without hesitation should mean being punished equally with those same violent criminals.  It's like treating a woman who makes false rape accusations the same way you treat a rapist and the death penalty is fully acceptable for that.

Alaska Airlines Pilot Who Took Magic Mushrooms and Tried To Switch off Plane Engine Mid-Flight Avoids Prison Term
November 18, 2025