Sure, the cat is malevolent and evil but have you ever tried one of its margaritas? Out of this world!!!

‘Drag Queen Bingo’ at University of Utah
November 16, 2025

□ [“European Leaders Pressure Zelensky Over Energy Kickback Scandal"]

If it's similar to what we've seen from DOGE in the US, they've been sending all this money to Ukraine which is already well-known for laundering.  The energy system was used to funnel it back to EU elites and whoever else is relevant.  So now they don't want to be caught profiting from this because these rich leftists claim to oppose profit.

So out of curiosity, would Russia be involved in this?  It's not like they don't know how to loot, bribe, launder or steal money already.  This would also explain why they haven't been trying that hard to wipe out Ukraine entirely.  I've noticed for years that this is unusual for an invading Russia and that might be why, the Russians-in-charge are being paid off too.  They'll eventually take over anyway but their bank accounts would prefer they do it slowly.

This is undoubtedly going to hurt the chances of Ukraine joining NATO or the EU.  Well, at least NATO because Trump will have a say.  What a coincidence if the people insisting that troops be sent in immediately are the same ones getting money from the kickbacks.  They probably have NGOs and other middlemen handling the actual transfers so any one of them might spill the beans.  Europeans are already pissed at their elites and this is why you were so hungry for war?

Not sure how the Nord Stream pipeline was connected.  Near as I can tell, it's mostly owned (or controlled) by Russia with other EU businesses handling the rest.  Ukraine might have sent the troops to do the actual destruction but otherwise it doesn't look like they had much to do with it.  It was clearly a major part of getting this war started, I just don't see exactly how.

US Marines Protect US Embassy in Haiti Exchange Gunfire with Gang Members
November 16, 2025

□ [“'¡Viva la Revolución!' Massive Mexico City Riot; Thousands Storm Presidential Palace"]

Was not expecting this.  I would assume we've had operations going on all the way south of the border since roughly January 20, looking at who and where the biggest dangers are.  Mexico is an obvious place and the female in charge lives in the capital city.  These are reportedly thousands of young people opposed to President Claudia Sheinbaum catering to the cartels.

They attacked police, lots of injuries.  Doesn't look like they actually entered the palace itself but they were on the grounds.  I keep saying this but SEE Britain?  See France?  This is what you need to do!  Start putting those m*#@(*&ers in serious fear for their lives!  Make them rush to grab whatever cash is available and jump a helicopter before it's too late.  Even Mexico isn't doing enough right now but it's a start.

I'm guessing the cartels are ultimately controlled by Venezuela but that's just speculation.  I'm sure they're part of a larger, probably globalist, group.  That's why I'm glad to hear about this as the Venezuelan attack is ready, even though there's no way to know what will happen to Mexico here.  But the cartels are probably doing a lot of the heavy lifting to bring in drugs, slaves, etc. and need to be surrounded so they can be wiped out.

□ [“Democrat Senator Furious That Trump Hit Narco-Terrorists Instead of 'Following Procedure'"]

And they have their agents installed in-power all across the continent.  He threw in a few lines about going after the bad guys but immediately resumed attacking Trump and Republicans for doing something about them.  The biggest difficulty with this is that there's no way to get rid of all the cartels' allies without openly being a purge, indistinguishable from any other.  There's a reason most of these battles are fought away from the public eye because it does look horrible no matter what.  But here we are.

Another United Flight Makes Emergency Landing in St. Louis Due to Bomb Threat
November 16, 2025

□ [“Federal Agents Flood Charlotte as Trump Intensifies Crackdown on Illegal Immigration"]

Have they already taken care of NYC and Chicago or are they skipping that like wusses?  A bit more seriously, I'm wondering if part of the point was to get the cartels to move the most violent invaders to other, less-obvious cities, hoping they wouldn't get noticed for a while.  I don't recall Charlotte being on the list of possible cities to go after.

But it is odd how this hasn't been getting much attention and hasn't for a while.  It's been over three months since Trump sent the National Guard into DC and that's been ignored for most of those three months.  At this point, I'm not sure what cities Trump has sent the troops into although I'm sure there are operations going on all over.  I'm getting the impression the crime rate is going down as Democrats have fewer rapists and murderers to protect but they can't admit that because the citizens actually like having less crime.

So all they can do is fall back on standard leftist rhetoric how anything they don't like is fascist or kkk or whatever.  Just the fact that they aren't punished for complaining is proof that it's like that at all but these people aren't the sharpest tools in the shed.  But they know who put them in office so that's who they need to pander to.

It's also possible some of the gangs are getting desperate because they have nothing to fall back on and are in enemy territory.  A town in Wisconsin has had to go alert because a gang from South America is just looting homes.  It's possible they don't know any better but you'd think someone would be advising them about self-protection.  They might need to run to Canada to escape.

Staten Island Renews Push to Secede From New York City Due to Zohran Mamdani Mayoral Win
November 15, 2025

Ten Years After the Paris Climate Agreement, Climatism Is Crumbling
November 16, 2025

□ [“Stephen A. Smith Calls Out Democrats for Unwillingness to Defend Their Beliefs"]

Why is this guy on ESPN?  The only attention he gets is for talking about politics which, IIRC, is not what ESPN is about?  It's things like this that lead to my theory that leftists have actively established people to challenge them, at least to an extent.  In Congress, they're RINOs and John Fetterman.  In the media, there's Bill Maher and this guy.  They almost never vote against Democrats but they at least say things in public which disagree with the leftist agenda.

Here he's listing all the Democrats he's invited to be on his show but always refused, as opposed to all the Republicans who are fine going to places where not everybody agrees with them.  Another theory I have - which contradicts the one I just mentioned - is that this is the first step in getting away from leftism, recognizing that your side isn't always correct but refuses to acknowledge that.  They always stay in their well-paid areas and never risk losing their jobs but their public image is at least not totally leftist.

Otherwise the media is generally trying to double-down.  Notice how unpopular Trump is now, just as he was before the election and just as he was in his first term.  Somehow there's all these Trump voters who hate him now, they never expected what he's doing despite three campaigns promising to do exactly this.  That may be why they posted this guy on ESPN, hoping to get to trans sports in a decade or so.

Alaska Public School Puts ‘Does Not Endorse’ Stickers on US Constitution, Declaration of Independence
November 16, 2025