I could write funnier jokes here, but nobody would read them anyway.

Top Kamala Surrogate Denigrates Bill of Rights, Calls Transformational Document ‘A Little Piece of Paper’
August 27, 2024

□ [“Kamala Harris Now Supports Spending Hundreds of Millions on Building Trump Border Wall"]
□ [“Kamala campaign flip-flops on EV mandates"]

The downside to keeping others on a leach is that you can't get very far away from them, or that's the same as them escaping from you.  You're the one who wants power over them, that's why you put the leash on them.  But now she has to pretend she never had anything to do with her previous claims.  In 2019, she co-sponsored a bill to mandate 100% electric vehicles by 2040.  That's Congressional record.  It never got voted on, but that's probably why Harris likes it.

Which would be more depressing, that Harris is blatantly lying about her beliefs in order to get more power or that she has no clue whatsoever about any of this and is just following orders?  It's much more likely that she believed her previous statements and is only lying now to try to fool people but it doesn't make her look good either way.

□ [“New York Times turns on Kamala, runs a string of op-eds slamming her as 'weak', 'a phony' and 'ignorant'"]

The chances go down with each passing day, but I can't drop the theory that they are setting her up to fail before the stolen election ever gets here.  She doesn't have to do interviews or speeches to give an explanation for any of this stupidity, so even the media realizes that its standards can't get much lower to keep putting up with this.

Perhaps this is some sort of social vaccine against the cult mentality virus - and no, I can't believe I'm using that analogy these days, but there you go - because it takes very little to see the idiocy of going for a brainless puppet who can't say anything or do anything except support the enemy because *TRUMP!!!*  It's disturbing how many people are that idiotic, but there is a limit and I think they're reaching it, much earlier than I'd have expected.

Jack Smith Indicts Trump Again in DC Following SCOTUS Presidential Immunity Ruling
August 27, 2024

□ [“Trump and Kamala Harris to Stick to Old Rules for ‘ABC Fake News’ September 10 Debate"]

Another example of not being able to get away from the leash.  She's so equal to everybody else that she can demand totally new rules for her?  That's not going to fly.  Might as well change the rules of the Olympics so she can win a gold medal by sitting in the stands.  Men would be ashamed if they tried to get away with that, and that's why she's here.

I'm going to be optimistic and say she'll do better than Biden.  There's plenty of obvious reasons to think she won't, but I'll assume she can be trained to say the same phrases she's been paid to say all these years.  Trump could easily surprise her, and I hope he will, but in that regard, I'll be pessimistic and assume he won't.

The rulers can't avoid letting this happen, not without nuclear war or some sort of unpredictable disaster happening.  But there's no way this will work out well for them.  Just a few months ago, Biden was going to do a great job and they all knew it.  Then they were disappointed and tried to find all sorts of reasons for the failure, avoiding the obvious because Biden was still in great shape and promised to not drop out of the race.  They were thrilled when they could finally stop putting up with that lie.

Because of the timing, I've been thinking about the Neil Gaiman issue, and I've even asked Dave Sim for his opinion.  His answer was mostly about adultery, which I hadn't even thought of in Gaiman's context, but it certainly fits Harris' career.  Elites have never liked the 7th Commandment and are always surprised when there are consequences.

Or maybe the debate will start with Trump and Harris making out.  This is 2024, is that really out of the realm of possibility?  I've just seen that CNN has finally gotten a scheduled interview with Harris and Walz, he'll probably do most of the talking.

New Migrant Wave Heading to U.S. Includes Many Chinese, South Americans, Middle Easterners
August 27, 2024

□ [“Chicago Plans to Launch City-Run Grocery Stores"]

This is only a "study" but it says they can start three stores for only $26.7 million.  That's a hell of a deal.  How much will they have to spend on security to keep the place from being robbed clean the first week?  Just kidding, they'll never get that far.  In five years, they'll need another $100 million to get the first store open because it would be the only grocery store in town.

But in theory, I like the idea.  It's guaranteed to failure and will provide another example of why the government shouldn't be involved in the first place.  The people who voted Democrat all these decades and are left with this will just have to starve, so that's win-win.  It's even possible that a handful of officials involved in this "study" and however far it gets will see why government shouldn't be involved in these things.

There's the building, maintenance, electricity, cleaning.  There's the employees, hiring, background checking, organization, supervision.  There's arrangements with companies that produce food and those who deliver it.  Then there's all the city, state and federal laws and regulations you need to follow.  You'll need lawyers and accountants, who need clerks and secretaries.  And that's not counting the problems of dealing with each other day-after-day, not to mention the customers or the robberies.

I've never ran a grocery store so I'm probably missing some important details, but you really think you can successfully handle that for one store, much less three?  But at least these political officials will probably get raises, promotions and awards for saying how much they care about "fighting food insecurity."  Brother, you asked for it.

California Democrats Vote to Force Taxpayers to Subsidize $150,000 Down Payment on Homes for Illegals
August 27, 2024

□ [“Trump Declares War on ‘Crooked’ and ‘Dishonest’ Washington Establishment: ‘They’re Gonna be Held Accountable’"]

When?  Everybody who matters sees the tyranny and we aren't getting any younger.  We need some actual evidence that you're going to do anything this time around.  I like the idea, not complaining about that.  I even have enough military experience to know that there needs to be a certain mindset that will prepare people for what's about to happen.  But we also need to know what's about to happen.

□ [“Zuckerberg Admits to Massive Govt Censorship Regime:  'We promise to fight it next time'"]

Otherwise we're left with this.  What incentive does he have to fight it next time?  I'm not sure what the current issue with social media is really about, but there's little hope for any of them and none for Zuckerberg.  He doesn't even consider "freedom of speech," much less defend it.  That's how our rulers are, as we can see by their response to Zuckerberg's letter:

“When confronted with a deadly pandemic, this administration encouraged responsible actions to protect public health and safety.  Our position has been clear and consistent:  we believe tech companies and other private actors should take into account the effects their actions have on the American people, while making independent choices about the information they present.”

Horse hockey.  They give orders to tech companies and other private actors and lie about it being "independent choices."  They push false-information over the truth, as we see with facebook's treatment of the lies about the virus and vaccine.  They don't even admit their own mistakes.  Joe Biden insisted the vaccine would prevent you getting the virus and that he had the vaccine, how many times has he had the virus by this point?

You don't know the truth.  You don't decide what's true for anybody else.  You don't silence or censor people.  You are the crooked and dishonest government Trump is talking about, and we can't trust him either.  That's what freedom is and that's why it's worth fighting for.  If you don't agree, you're the enemy.

German Chancellor Talks Tough, Promises Deportations after Migrant’s Stabbing Spree Rattles German Society
August 27, 2024

□ [“Michigan Secretary of State Says RFK Jr. Will Be on 2024 Ballot Despite Suspending Campaign"]

This is an aspect of civil war 2.0 most people won't understand.  I know I don't, but one of the points to our (former) republic is that each state decides how their election process works.  They're each closer to their people than the federal government is, and it's harder to cheat if you need to take over dozens of different vote-counting states.

So this sounds like a sensible resistance to Democrat election theft.  RFK Jr. is on the ballet in crucial states but not in states Trump will easily win.  It's a way of rigging an election in accordance with their own rules, Michigan is kicking off another candidate, Cornel West, who is a total leftist.  As an added bonus, RFK Jr. is still kept informed of the election-in-process as Democrats steal it, giving Trump access to info he can use against them.

One reason I assume we won't make it to the election is because there's no reason to trust the results no matter what.  The left only goes along when they win, and the rest of us expect them to steal it anyway.  The results will probably be different in each state and at this point, we should just assume they're run by leftist dictators, at least in the capitol cities.  Make sure you have your back-up supplies.

Oklahoma Town Rallies Behind Teen Told By School Officials He Can’t Fly US Flag on His Pick-Up
August 27, 2024